This is for help with a short paper no more than 2 pgs needed.

Research and review how a major online retailer of your choice is implementing disaster recovery for their operations. Also discuss the reasons they have decided on their approach.

For additional details, refer to the Short Paper/Case Study Rubric document attached.

Short Paper/Case Study Rubric (Undergraduate) Guidelines for Submission: Short papers should use double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins. Sources should be cited according to a discipline-appropriate citation method. Page-length requirements: 1-2 pages. Instructor Feedback: This activity uses an integrated rubric in Blackboard. Students can view instructor feedback in the Grade Center. For more information, review these instructions. Critical Elements Main Elements Inquiry and Analysis Integration and Application Critical Thinking Research Writing (Mechanics/Citations) Exemplary (100%) Includes all of the main elements and requirements and cites multiple examples to illustrate each element Provides in-depth analysis that demonstrates complete understanding of multiple concepts All of the course concepts are correctly applied Draws insightful conclusions that are thoroughly defended with evidence and examples Incorporates many scholarly resources effectively that reflect depth and breadth of research No errors related to organization, grammar and style, and citations Proficient (85%) Includes most of the main elements and requirements and cites many examples to illustrate each element Provides in-depth analysis that demonstrates complete understanding of some concepts Most of the course concepts are correctly applied Draws informed conclusions that are justified with evidence Needs Improvement (55%) Includes some of the main elements and requirements Not Evident (0%) Does not include any of the main elements and requirements Value 25 Provides in-depth analysis that demonstrates complete understanding of minimal concepts Some of the course concepts are correctly applied Draws logical conclusions, but does not defend with evidence Does not provide in-depth analysis 20 Does not correctly apply any of the course concepts Does not draw logical conclusions 10 Incorporates some scholarly resources effectively that reflect depth and breadth of research Minor errors related to organization, grammar and style, and citations Incorporates very few scholarly resources that reflect depth and breadth of research Does not incorporate scholarly resources that reflect depth and breadth of research 15 Some errors related to organization, grammar and style, and citations Major errors related to organization, grammar and style, and citations 10 Total 20 100%