This project requires you to find secondary authority and case law relevant to the question posed from the fact pattern. Fact pattern: You are a paralegal in a Maryland general practice law firm. The intake paralegal who screens new client phone calls has set up an appointment for a prospective client to meet with your supervisory attorney later in the day. All you know about the case is this: (a) the client is being charged in federal court with a violation of a federal statute that prohibits assault or impeding (obstructing) a federal officer in the execution of his duties and (b) the client admitted to the intake paralegal that he did in fact get yell at, and shove, a man wearing khakis and a polo shirt with some sort of badge logo but he thought the man must have been off-duty because the incident took place at a campsite at a federal national park. Your supervisory attorney wants you to research secondary legal authority on what constitutes the performance of official duties for purposes of assault or impeding a federal officer. Additional instructions: The cases you select for this project must be a U.S. Supreme Court case, a U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals case, or a U.S. District Court case. However, the case must be published (tip: look for a print citation) and must not be a memorandum opinion or an order. Do not use a case from the Federal Appendix because those are not considered published. You may not use the same case for both parts. A.L.R. usually provides more cases in annotations than AmJur2d does in its articles, which may mean that you have to rethink which case you'll use for Part 1 to ensure there is no duplication with Part 2. Research Question: What constitutes \"engaging in the performance of official duties\" for purposes of assault or impeding a federal officer? Part 1 - American Law Reports 1.Provide the title, author and publication data (ALR series, volume #, start page) for one ALR annotation that has information directly relevant to the research question. 2.Within this annotation, what are the title(s) and number(s) of the most directly relevant sections? Why are these sections directly relevant to the question? 3.Give the name of one federal court opinion referenced in one of these sections that appears to be relevant to the question. Why do you think it is relevant based on the information in the annotation? Note: this case may be a U.S. Supreme Court case, a U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals case, or a U.S. District Court case. But the case must be published (tip: look for a print citation) and must not be a memorandum opinion or an order. Do not use a case from the Federal Appendix because it is not considered published. 4.Retrieve the full court opinion you referenced in #3. Explain why this opinion is relevant to your question using a quote from the summary or syllabus or the introductory part of the opinion that shows that the opinion is relevant to your question. 5.For the court opinion you referenced in #3, tell where that opinion is published (reporter, volume number, start page), what court wrote the opinion, and what year was the opinion decided. Do not provide a citation. Use the following format: Reporter Volume Number Start Page Court Year Part 2 - American Jurisprudence 2d 1.Provide the title of an article in AmJur2d and the number and names of the sections that have information directly relevant to your question. Why are these sections relevant? 2.Give the name of one federal court opinion referenced in one of these sections that appears to be relevant to the question. Why do you think it is relevant based on the information in the encyclopedia article? Note: this case may be a U.S. Supreme Court case, a U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals case, or a U.S. District Court case. But the case must be published (tip: look for a print citation) and must not be a memorandum opinion or an order. Do not use a case from the Federal Appendix because those are not considered published. 3.Retrieve and read the full the court opinion you referenced in #2. Explain why this opinion is relevant to your question using a quote from the summary or syllabus or the introductory part of the opinion that shows that the opinion is relevant to your question. 4.For the court opinion you referenced in #2, tell where that opinion is published (reporter, volume number, start page), what court wrote the opinion, and what year was the opinion decided. Do not provide a citation. Use the following format: Use the following format: Reporter Volume Number Start Page Court Year