The Ethics section (below) describes a case in which a paralegal who had been orally promised a
Question:
The Ethics section (below) describes a case in which a paralegal who had been orally promised a bonus of $1,065,000 was deprived of the bonus in a dispute because no written agreement existed as to the bonus as would have been required by the Statute of Frauds. That an agreement was had was beyond dispute, because there existed a (secret) recording detailing the promise of the bonus between the paralegal and his/her employer. As your text explains, the Statute of Frauds requires certain types of contracts (such as contracts to buy or sale land) to be both made in writing and executed with the physical signatures of all of the parties involved. This requirement was clearly not met. Further, the undisclosed recording of the agreement constitutes a crime. Was a fair result handed down in this matter? What, if anything, would you do to modify the Court's decision?
Ethics Paralegal Loses $900,000 Bonus Because of the Statute of Frauds The end result may not seem 'fair' to Sawyer. The Stat- ute of Frauds, by its own terms, can be considered 'harsh' in that it will bar oral agreements between parties under certain conditions. This is simply the nature of the beast." held that the Statute of Frauds required the bonus agree- ment between Sawyer and Mills to be in writing to be enforceable. Because the oral agreement exceeded one year, the court held that it did not meet the requirements of the Statute of Frauds and was therefore unenforceable. -Ishmael, Trial Court Judge The trial court judge stated: Barbara Lucinda Sawyer worked as a paralegal for Melbourne Mills, Jr. an attorney at a law firm. Sawyer pro- nosed that Mills and the law firm become engaged in class action lawsuits. Mills agreed to pay Sawyer an unspeci- fied bonus when "the ship comes in." After Sawyer's assistance and persistence, the law firm became involved in class action litigation-primarily the Fen-Phen pharma- ceutical liability class action litigation. After the law firm received millions of dollars in fees from the Fen-Phen class action lawsuits, Sawyer and her husband Steve met with Mills to discuss Sawyers' bonus. Mills oraly agreed to pay Sawyer $1,065,000 as a bonus to be paid in monthly installments over 107 months. Sawyer secretly tape recorded the conversation. Mills later refused to sign a written contract conveying the terms of the oral agreement. After Mills had paid $165,000, he quit meking further payments. Sawyer sued Mills to collect the remaining $900,000. Mills defended, arguing that the oral contract exceeded one year and was therefore unenforceable because it was not in writing, as required by the Statute of Frauds. The jury ruled in favor of Sawyer. Mills made a motion to the trial court judge to refuse to enforce the oral contract against him. The trial court The Court is aware of the apparent harshness of this ruling. The trial jury found, and the Court heard Mills state on the tape recording, that he agreed to make monthly payments to Sawyer which would eventually total over One Million Dollars. Honoring that oral agree- ment would be the "moral" and "right" thing for Mills to do. However, this Court is obligated by Oath of Office and Kentucky law, to consider cases based on the facts presented and the applicable law. The end result may not seem "fair" to Sawyer. The Statute of Frauds, by its own terms, can be considered "harsh" in that it will bar oral agreements between parties under certain condi- tions. This is simply the nature of the beast. The court of appeals of Kentucky affirmed the trial court's decision. Sawyer v. Mills, Web 2007 Ky. App. Lexis 92 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky) Ethics Questions Should Mills do the "moral" thing and honor his oral agreement with Sawyer? How often do you think the application of the Statute of Frauds leads to an unfair result? Ethics Paralegal Loses $900,000 Bonus Because of the Statute of Frauds The end result may not seem 'fair' to Sawyer. The Stat- ute of Frauds, by its own terms, can be considered 'harsh' in that it will bar oral agreements between parties under certain conditions. This is simply the nature of the beast." held that the Statute of Frauds required the bonus agree- ment between Sawyer and Mills to be in writing to be enforceable. Because the oral agreement exceeded one year, the court held that it did not meet the requirements of the Statute of Frauds and was therefore unenforceable. -Ishmael, Trial Court Judge The trial court judge stated: Barbara Lucinda Sawyer worked as a paralegal for Melbourne Mills, Jr. an attorney at a law firm. Sawyer pro- nosed that Mills and the law firm become engaged in class action lawsuits. Mills agreed to pay Sawyer an unspeci- fied bonus when "the ship comes in." After Sawyer's assistance and persistence, the law firm became involved in class action litigation-primarily the Fen-Phen pharma- ceutical liability class action litigation. After the law firm received millions of dollars in fees from the Fen-Phen class action lawsuits, Sawyer and her husband Steve met with Mills to discuss Sawyers' bonus. Mills oraly agreed to pay Sawyer $1,065,000 as a bonus to be paid in monthly installments over 107 months. Sawyer secretly tape recorded the conversation. Mills later refused to sign a written contract conveying the terms of the oral agreement. After Mills had paid $165,000, he quit meking further payments. Sawyer sued Mills to collect the remaining $900,000. Mills defended, arguing that the oral contract exceeded one year and was therefore unenforceable because it was not in writing, as required by the Statute of Frauds. The jury ruled in favor of Sawyer. Mills made a motion to the trial court judge to refuse to enforce the oral contract against him. The trial court The Court is aware of the apparent harshness of this ruling. The trial jury found, and the Court heard Mills state on the tape recording, that he agreed to make monthly payments to Sawyer which would eventually total over One Million Dollars. Honoring that oral agree- ment would be the "moral" and "right" thing for Mills to do. However, this Court is obligated by Oath of Office and Kentucky law, to consider cases based on the facts presented and the applicable law. The end result may not seem "fair" to Sawyer. The Statute of Frauds, by its own terms, can be considered "harsh" in that it will bar oral agreements between parties under certain condi- tions. This is simply the nature of the beast. The court of appeals of Kentucky affirmed the trial court's decision. Sawyer v. Mills, Web 2007 Ky. App. Lexis 92 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky) Ethics Questions Should Mills do the "moral" thing and honor his oral agreement with Sawyer? How often do you think the application of the Statute of Frauds leads to an unfair result?
Expert Answer:
Sawyer v Mills a 2007 case included an oral promise of a bonus payment totaling 1065000 Barbra Sawye... View the full answer
Students also viewed these business communication questions
-
The Single European Act is a case in which it was difficult to create an agreement, despite of the fact that there was near unanimity in support for an agreement. If everyone wanted the agreement,...
-
A common strategy for handling a case in which an observation is missing data for one or more variables is to fill those missing variables with 0s and add a variable to the model that takes the value...
-
Suggest a case in which a sunk cost (fixed cost or prepaid costs) would be useful to a company. Provide support for your response. Suppose on January 1 a company prepays medical insurance premiums...
-
In Problem 10.16, we projected financial statements for Walmart Stores for Years +1 through +5. The data in Chapter 12s Exhibits 12.1612.18 include the actual amounts for 2008 and the projected...
-
A small charged object is placed and held just above the positive end of an electric dipole. The dipole starts to accelerate downward when released. (a) What is the sign of the charge on the object?...
-
To guarantee maximum independence and organizational impact of analytics, it is important that a. The chief data officer (CDO) or chief analytics officer (CAO) reports to the CIO or CFO. b. The CIO...
-
How should auditors search for hidden liabilities?
-
On May 31, 2017, Reber Company had a cash balance per books of $6,781.50. The bank statement from New York State Bank on that date showed a balance of $6,404.60. A comparison of the statement with...
-
Fit a trigonometric function of the form f(t) = co + c sin(t) + C2 cos(t) to the data points (0, -7.5), (1, 12.5), (, 8.5), (3, -5.5), using least squares. CO = C = C2 II
-
European Styles, Inc. manufactures womens blouses of one quality, which are produced in lots to fill each special order. Its customers are department stores in various cities. European Styles sews...
-
You are given the expression 36x^(4)y^(3) - 16x^(3)y. Find a common factor for the expression that has a coefficient other than 1 and that contains at least one variable.
-
Provide two examples of tests of details of balances and transactions.
-
What are the limits on the efficiency of a screw jack to be of the self-locking type?
-
Fraudulent financial reporting has been described as a function of three requirements. Describe these requirements (not the primary or secondary indicators of each requirement).
-
What matters should an auditor consider when planning an audit?
-
Explain how stewardship or agency theory helps to explain the demand for audits.
-
Vince and Gina made a cash contribution at the end of 2020 to their church in the amount of $575. In whichscenario will they be able to deduct this entire contribution on their tax return? (Best opti...
-
Research corporate acquisitions using Web resources and then answer the following questions: Why do firms purchase other corporations? Do firms pay too much for the acquired corporation? Why do so...
-
What does the trade-to-GDP ratio measure? Does a low value indicate that a country is closed to trade with the outside world?
-
Which of the three motives for holding foreign exchange are applicable to each of the following? a. A tourist. b. A bond trader. c. A portfolio manager. d. A manufacturer.
-
The Uruguay Round of the GATT began a process of phasing out the use of voluntary export restraints. Why did they come into widespread use in the 1980s? For example, given that VERs are a form of...
-
Today many people purchase collectible items as investments. They buy baseball cards, commemorative coins, stuffed animals, and art.
-
Every day after school, Trent volunteers at his neighborhood community center. He helps the young children with their homework and organizes sports activities. Trent really believes in the work that...
-
What are some sources of financial information?
Study smarter with the SolutionInn App