Three engineers are working in a government engineering office (GEO) as inspectors for newly constructed commercial buildings. The three engineers can be listed as follows: 1. Engineer D is an Architectural engineer 2. Engineer E is a Petroleum engineer 3. Engineer F is a Chemical engineer The three engineers were assigned to inspect a building for a petroleum company (PC) that specializes in petroleum exploration. The building should be inspected for compliance with municipal construction standards. The building is part of the drilling tower and should be inspected for chemical contamination and pollution. The inspection comments for each engineer can be summarized as follows: a Engineer D completed the survey (identifying the legal boundaries for land ownership) to ensure that buildings are constructed within the permitted area. Engineer D found that the building was constructed beyond the permitted given area. PC offered Engineer D to work on this problem to correct this issue and receive a high salary for three months. b. Engineer E inspected the surrounding area of the drilling tower and noticed a high petroleum contamination in the natural green area around the drilling tower. However, Engineer E offered PC to clean the area using the high-tech equipment provided by the GEO, but Engineer E requested PC to pay for this work. c. Engineer F evaluated the air quality in the area and noticed a high level of air pollutants level. PC requested Engineer Fto not report this high level of pollution because there is no law to regulate the air quality in this area. The final report should summarize the final decisions concluded by all engineers. HW 2- SP 2022 GENG 215 - Page 1 of 5 ENGINEERING ETHICS CASE STUDY - Answer Form Limit Answer to provided spaces and do not change homework format, otherwise, homework will not be accepted 1. Explain the ethical dilemma(s) in this case for three engineers? (4 points) CL01 2. Write two ethical obligations of three engineers working in the GEO? (2 points) CLO4 3- Write three ethical issues that would face the three engineers in this case. (6 points) CLO1 4. What actions should be taken by engineers based on the NSPE code of ethics? Answer the following questions based on the NSPE code of ethics and using applicable code items in each section of the code: 1, II, and III. (When using NSPE Canons, write the section number only and do not copy it.) - CLO4 What should Engineer D do in this case to avoid having an ethical Based on applicable items in dilemma with his employer? NSPE code of ethics Action 1(2 pnt) Answer of this section should be in the form of 1-2-c, or II-1-a, or III-1-b Based on item from sec. t 2 pnt Based on item from sec. It 2 pnt Based on item from sec. It: 2 pnt What should Engineer E do in this case to avoid a violation of the NSPE code of ethics? Action 2 (2 pnt) Answer of this section should be in the form of 1-2-c, or 1l-1-a, or III-1-b Based on item from sec. I: 2 pnt Based on item from sec. ll: 2 pnt Based on item from sec. Ill: 2 pnt What Engineer F should do in this case to avoid harming the building residents or the owner? Action 3 (2 pnt) Answer of this section should be in the form of 1-2-c, or 1l-1-a, or III-1-b Based on item from sect 2 pnt Based on item from sec. It: 2 pnt Based on item from secb Ill 2 pnt 5. What Engineer D should do in this case based on moral beliefs using the utilitarian theory ? Answer should be specific to case. (2 pnt) CLO3 6- What should Engineer E do in this case based on moral beliefs using the Right Ethics theory? The answer should be specific to the case. (2 pnt) CLO3
