Three of following scenarios would form a valid basis for a party to appeal a decision of a trial court. Which one of the following could NOT form the basis for an appeal from the trial court?

The jury ignored the facts in rendering its verdict for the defendant and the plaintiff is now appealing $*$ the trial court judge's denial of his motion for judgment non obstante veredicto.

The judge, in overruling defense counsel's objection, allowed highly prejudicial evidence with no probative value to be presented to the jury.

The jury completely ignored the facts in rendering its verdict for the defendant and the plaintiff feels the outcome was unfair as a result.

The plaintiff believes that the trial court judge should not have granted the defendant's $12($c$)$ motion for judgment on the pleadings.