Three people robbed a convenience store. The accused defendant on trial, an unknown masked accomplice, and a get away driver. An eyewitness got the plate number of the car, but it was a stolen vehicle.Luckily, it was found two days later and the accused defendant's fingerprints were found in the car. Is this evidence admissible in his robbery trial?Explain why or why not using your knowledge of the requirement that evidence be relevant and the use of circumstantial evidence.