Time left $1$:$56$:$09$

Question $24$

Not yet answered

Marked out of $1\mathrm{.}00$

$24.$ An unmarried couple had purchased a home in Calgary. After living together $10$ s$$x $(0)$ years, differences arose between them, and they attempted to negotiate a settlement of their respective interest in the home and its furnishings and improvements. Shortly after they separated, the couple began negotiating a resolution of their affairs via emails with their names at bottom of the emails. They entered into an agreement dividing the proceeds of sale of their home and its contents. When the plaintiff $($man$)$ performed his side of the agreement, the defendant $($woman$)$ refused to honor the deal as it violates the Statute of Frauds. Was there an agreement? If yes, was the agreement complied with the Statute? From the choices below, the court would likely rule that:

a$.$ There was an agreement, and the agreement was not in compliance with the statute.

b$.$ There was no agreement at all because the exchange of emails cannot be considered compliance with the statute.

c$.$ There was an agreement and the agreement complied with the statute and the plaintiff can obtain remedy from the court.

d$.$ There was no agreement, and the plaintiff cannot obtain remedy from the court.

$?$