Time Magazine publishes a report that Plaintiff and her husband, both of whom are wealthy socialites, were granted a divorce based on adultery, when in fact the divorce was granted on other grounds. The court's final judgment reads (in part): According to certain testimony in behalf of the defendant, extramarital escapades of the plaintiff were bizarre and of an amatory nature which would have made Dr. Freud's hair curl. Other testimony, in plaintiff's behalf, would indicate that defendant was guilty of bounding from one bedpartner to another with the erotic zest of a satyr. The court is inclined to discount much of this testimony as unreliable. Nevertheless, it is the conclusion and finding of the court that neither party is domesticated, within the meaning of that term as used by the Supreme Court of Florida ... In the present case, it is abundantly clear from the evidence of marital discord, that neither of the parties has shown the least susceptibility to domestication Times' article

Divorced. By Russell A. Firestone, Jr., 41, heir to the tire fortune: Mary Alice Sullivan Firestone, 32, his third wife; a onetime Palm Beach schoolteacher, on grounds of extreme cruelty and adultery; after six years of marriage, one son; in West Palm Beach, Florida. The 17-month intermittent trial produced enough testimony of extramarital adventures on both sides, said the judge, "to make Dr. Freud's hair curl." Time, Inc. v. Firestone 424 U.S. 488 (1976)*

Discuss the elements of tort and liability in this case.