TIP Tech orally agrees to sell Honeycrisp $1 million of batteries for its new mobile phone. The batteries have a custom design that none of TIP Tech's other customers use. At the last minute, Honeycrisp decides to cancel its new mobile phone product and stops responding to TIP Tech's communications. TIP Tech sues Honeycrisp for breaching the contract. Who wins? TIP Tech wins because Honeycrisp admitted that there was a contract; therefore, a court will enforce the oral contract. TIP Tech wins because the goods were customized for Honeycrisp; therefore, the statute of frauds does not apply. Honeycrisp wins because contracts for the sale of goods in excess of $500 must be in writing and this was not; therefore, it is unenforceable. Honeycrisp wins because TIP Tech did not rely on the contract to its detriment