Question
Title : CHINA'S DAIRY UNITED:ANEW MODEL FOR MILK PRODUCTION Authors of the paper : JINGJING WANG, MEI CHEN, AND PETER G. KLEIN Journal: American Journal
Title : CHINA'S DAIRY UNITED:ANEW MODEL FOR MILK PRODUCTION
Authors of the paper : JINGJING WANG, MEI CHEN, AND PETER G. KLEIN
Journal: American Journal Agri Economics 2015
Hello tutor please help me with this case study answer I wanted to analysis the given case case accoeding to rubric please. Please help me with the task.
Please help tutor.
Case Study Grading Rubric
Case Study Component Area |
Grading Criteria and Evaluation Dimensions | Points | Weight | Total Score |
Identification of main business challenges in the case study: | Does not recognize the problems or issues of the case, or identifies problems and issues that are not based on facts of the case; displays little understanding of the issues, key problems, and the company's present situation and strategic challenges; executive summary does not present a clear overview of the case issues; main points are not outlined, or cannot be understood | |||
With a few exceptions, identifies and outlines the principal problems and issues in the case; demonstrates an acceptable understanding of the company's issues, current situation, and strategic challenges; executive summary provides an adequate overview of the case issues and problems; summary is missing a few minor points, but meets expectations | ||||
Presents accurate and detailed descriptions of the problems and issues central to the case; provides a well-focused diagnosis of strategic issues and key problems that demonstrates an excellent grasp of the company's present situation and strategic challenges; descriptions are compelling and insightful; provides a thorough and effective executive summary | ||||
15% | ||||
Stakeholder Perspectives | Does not identify or explain the perspectives of any stakeholders involved in the case, or explanation is flawed in many respects; fails to recognize any differences between the interests of the various stakeholders | |||
With a few minor exceptions, adequately identifies and summarizes the perspectives of the principal stakeholders involved in the case; outlines some conflicts of interest between company stakeholder | ||||
Clearly and accurately describes the unique perspectives of multiple key stakeholders in the case; demonstrates insightful analysis of strategic tensions or conflicts of interest between the stakeholders | ||||
10% | ||||
Makes little or no connection between the issues and problems in the case and relevant theoretical and empirical |
Connections to Theoretical and Empirical Research: | research, or the connections identified are weak or inaccurate in many respects | |||
Identifies and outlines connections between some of the issues and problems in the case and relevant theoretical and empirical research; the connections identified are adequately elucidated | ||||
Makes appropriate, insightful, and powerful connections between the issues and problems in the case and relevant theory and empirical data; effectively integrates multiple sources of knowledge with case information | ||||
15% | ||||
Analysis and Evaluation: | Simply repeats facts identified in the case and does not discuss the relevance of these facts; fails to draw conclusions, or conclusions are not justified or supported; does not present relevant research or data; shows no critical examination of case issues | |||
Provides an acceptable analysis of most of the issues and problems in the case; in most instances, analysis is adequately supported by theory and empirical data; appropriate conclusions are outlined and summarized | ||||
Presents a balanced, in-depth, and critical assessment of the facts of the case in light of relevant empirical and theoretical research; develops insightful and well-supported conclusions using reasoned, sound, and informed judgments | ||||
30% | ||||
Action Plans: | Has difficulty identifying alternatives and appropriate courses of action; few if any alternatives are presented, infeasible actions are proposed, action plans are not supported, or actions do not address the key issues and problems in the case | |||
Outlines and summarizes some alternative courses of action to deal with most of the issues and problems in the case; in most instances, proposed action plans are outlined, are feasible, and based on relatively sound theory and evidence | ||||
Effectively weighs and assesses a variety of alternative actions that address the multiple issues central to the case; proposes detailed plans of action; action plans are realistic and contain thorough and well-reasoned justifications | ||||
10% | ||||
Evaluation of Consequences: | Displays limited awareness and/or understanding of the consequences of action plans; fails to identify implications and consequences of proposed action plans; identified outcomes do not follow from proposed action plans, or outcomes are not related to issues in the case | |||
Demonstrates acceptable analysis of the results of proposed action plans; adequately outlines and summarizes the implications and consequences resulting from alternative courses of action; with a few minor exceptions, identified consequences of action plans are related to key issues in the case | ||||
Objectively and critically reflects upon alternative plans of action; effectively identifies, thoroughly discusses, and insightfully evaluates the implications and consequences resulting from the proposed action plans; identified consequences are tied to the key issues central to the case | ||||
10% | ||||
Presentation and Writing Mechanics | Writing is unfocused, rambling, or contains serious errors; poorly organized and does not follow specified guidelines. | |||
Occasional grammar or spelling errors, but still a clear presentation of ideas; lacks organization. | ||||
Demonstrates clarity, conciseness and correctness; formatting is appropriate and writing is free of grammar and spelling errors. Follow writing guidelines: report has title paige, abstract, introduction, clear objectives, analysis , evaluation of strategic options, and recommendations | ||||
10% | ||||
Total Points | 100% |
PLease help tiutor acording to rubric
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started