To raise revenue, a city erected billboards on the sides of all government buildings and planned to sell the space for commercial advertising. A city ordinance provided that any advertiser could rent the space, provided the activity or product advertised was legal and had "nothing to do with politics" because the city sought to "avoid controversy." The owner of a bookstore that specialized in political books sought to lease a billboard on a city building to place an ad. In addition to selling books, the owner conducted daily reading and study groups in the store on various political philosophies. The proposed ad implored onlookers to come to the bookstore to study communism at the store at 6 p.m. nightly. The ad was rejected by city officials. If the owner files an appropriate suit against the city in federal district court asserting violation of her First Amendment rights, is she likely to prevail? Group of answer choices No, because the restriction is viewpoint neutral and reasonably related to a legitimate government purpose. Yes, because restrictions on commercial speech must be narrowly tailored to serve a substantial government interest directly advanced by the restriction. Yes, because the city has made the sides of civic buildings public forums. No, because the restriction is content neutral and narrowly tailored to serve an important government interest