Todd, a financial advisor, provided expert professional advice to Miriam (aged 59) on how to invest a large inheritance she had received to best utilise superannuation and investment property tax concessions. Having worked full time since she was 18, Miriam was looking forward to a secure retirement. When Miriam turned 62, the laws concerning tax concessions to lump sum contributions to retirement savings and the purchase of investment property changed significantly, meaning the value of her investments has fallen by 40% and that she will have to keep working past 65. Miriam is devastated.

If Miriam sues Todd for negligence, will she be successful? Why or Why not?