Tony Tran, a free$-$lance gaming consultant and blogger, was in need of a new gaming system for his business. After some lengthy review, Tony decided to purchase a Apple Super $22$ gaming system for his business needs. Weeks after the one$-$year warranty expired, Tonys Apple Super $22$ system failed to operate due to a flaw in the product manufacture. Tony sued Apple, making the argument that the gaming system should have lasted at least a couple of years, which Tony viewed as a reasonable consumer expectation for such an expensive gaming system. Tony argued that Apples description of the gaming system as most reliable, and durable, were affirmative statements concerning the quality and performance of the gaming system, which Apple did not meet. How should the court rule? Why? Answer using the IRAC method, list the laws or concepts that apply to this case.