Topic B Problem: Imagine you have two competing athletes who have the option to use an illegal and/or dangerous drug to enhance their performance (i.e., dope). If neither athlete dopes, then neither gains an advantage. If only one dopes, then that athlete gains a massive advantage over their competitor, reduced by the medical and legal risks of doping. However, if both athletes dope, the advantages cancel out, and only the risks remain, putting them both in a worse position than if neither had been doping.

What concept best describes this situation? Using this concept, what outcome do we expect from these two athletes? Are there any factors that could change the outcome predicted by this concept? (Use concepts of monopolies, Oligopolies and Game Theory and Factor markets for this question)