4. Consumers Energy Inc (CSI) operates a coal fired power plant in Michigan, which has to come in compliance with nitrogen oxide (NOx) standards by reducing its NOx emissions to 50 tons per year from its current level of 150 tons/year. It is considering the following options to come in compliance. A) Install Selective Catalytic Reactor (SCR) on its boiler. SCR reduces NOx emissions by absorbing NOx in exhaust flue gases. SCR requires a capital investment of $600,000 in year zero and has a life of five years. Annual costs of replacing catalysts in the SCR are estimated at $50,000 and other additional operating costs of SCR are estimated at $60,000 per year. B) Install lean burners in the boilers. Lean burners reduce the amount of NOx formed during combustion by reducing the air fuel ratio and the operating temperature. The lean burners cost $200,000 to install and have a life of five years. Installing lean burners reduces the efficiency of electricity generation, which results in increased coal consumption in boilers of 5000 tons/year to supply the same amount of electricity. Coal prices are $ 40/ton and expected to remain at that level for the next five years. Lean burners also increase maintenance costs by $8000 per year. C) Continue to operate as usual, but buy NOx emission permits from the market each year. The permit prices are expected to be $2500 per ton in year 1 and increase at the rate of 10% year. Which option should CSI choose? CSI uses a discount rate of 10% in its decisions. The tax rate faced by CSI is 30%. CSI uses a straight line method in charging depreciation and both SCR and lean burners are expected to have no salvage values. Capital costs are not tax deductible, while operating costs, permit costs and depreciation expenses are tax deductible. How would your analysis change if the permit prices were expected increase at a rate of 15% per year? Please show all your intermediate steps and clearly state your assumptions if any