True or False (and why): If you have been convicted of murder in a federal district court, and you appeal your conviction to a regional Court of Appeals, you will certainly get your case overturned by the federal appellate court based on the fact that you presented new evidence before a jury in an appellate court, new evidence not heard in you trial that absolutely proves you are innocen O True, because the principal purpose of an appellate court is to review new evidence from courts of original jurisdiction O True, because the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution demands that new evidence be heard at any point in any court whether it be a trial or appellate court O False, because appellate courts have no original jurisdiction (i.e,, finding of facts based on evidence before a tryer of the facts). Appellate courts consider cases solely based on perceived errors in the application of law in the lower courts as determined from trial transcripts and applicable precedent. Facts in evidence are not heard, no juries are empaneled, and no new evidence is presented in appellate courts. O False, because murder convictions in a federal trial court can never be appealed according to the Second Amendment to the Constitution as well as the Judiciary Act of 1789 True, because that is the right and fair thing for the appellate court to do because that new evidence clearly proves you didn't do it