Try to answer at least six hundred words each In Wayde v NSW Rugby League [1965] 180 CLR the court considered the meaning of oppression in terms of s232 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth). Why did the court decide that the case presented by Wayde did not amount to oppression and why did the court refrain from substituting its own decision from that of the directors of the company? [Question 3 = 10 marks] Question 4 The term "comfort letter" is sometimes given to a document replying to an offer. What does the term "comfort letter" mean and might it constitute a valid acceptance of an offer? Your answer should contain reference to relevant common law cases