Two friends, Alex and Sam, go shopping. Alex is thinking of purchasing a new shirt for $$5$ that has a $"\text{'}$Made in Indonesia" tagon it$.$ Sam mentions how terrible working conditions are for textile workers in Indonesia. Sam states that $“$if they'd only charge$$10$ for their shirts, then all the sweatshop workers would be so much better off.

Why might Sam's argument be flawed?

The higher price would probably causeian increase

leading to a reduction in output

and employment in the Indonesian textile industry