Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Question
1 Approved Answer
Two mutually exclusive design alternatives are being considered. The estimated cash flows for each alternative are given below. The MARR is 10% per year. The
Two mutually exclusive design alternatives are being considered. The estimated cash flows for each alternative are given below. The MARR is 10% per year. The decision-maker can sele these alternatives or decide to select none of them. Make a recommendation based on the following methods. Design Y Investment cost Annual revenue Annual cost Useful life Salvage value a. Net PW Based on PW method, Design Z is more economical. b. The modified B/C ratio of Design Y is 36 (Round to two decimal places) The modified B/C ration of Design Z is .36 (Round to two decimal places) c. The incremental B/C ratio is 36 (Round to two decimal places) Therefore, based on the B/C ratio method, Design Z is more economical d. The discounted payback period of Design Y is 4.5 years (Round to one decimal place) The discounted payback period of Design Z is 7.3 years (Round to one decimal place) $140,000 $45,138 $9,314 15 years $14,700 $135,999 Design Z $275,000 $85,654 $27,386 15 years $33,000 $176,091 Therefore, based on the payback period method, Design Y would be preferred. (e) Why could the recommendations based on the payback period method be different from the other two methods? A. because the payback period gives more weight to the cash flows after the payback period B. because the payback period method ignores the cash flows after the payback period
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started