Under Adams' Method, California's apportionment in the $2000$ House of Representatives would have been $50$ seats even though California's standard quota is $52\mathrm{.}45.$ What does this fact illustrate about Adams' Method?

Group of answer choices

Adams' Method can produce upper$-$quota violations.

Adams' Method has a bias in favor of large states.

Adams' Method can produce lower$-$quota violations.

Adams' Method is the best apportionment method.