Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

00
1 Approved Answer

Under negligence, if a defendant did everything they reasonably could to take care, then: Question 41 options: A) The defendant does not satisfy causation B)

Under negligence, if a defendant did everything they reasonably could to take care, then:

Question 41 options:

A) The defendant does not satisfy causation
B) The defendant is still liable
C) The defendant is not liable
D) The defendant breached the standard of care

Which of the following is typically the most expensive form of Alternative Dispute Resolution?

Question 42 options:

A) Negotiation
B) Litigation
C) Mediation
D) Arbitration

At what phase of inquiry in a negligence analysis would the court consider the thin skull rule?

Question 43 options:

A) Duty of care
B) Causation
C) Standard of care
D) Remoteness

What is the purpose of a deductible in the context of an insurance policy?

Question 44 options:

A) The insurer is entitled to deduct defence costs from its payout to the insured.
B) The amount of the insurance proceeds is reduced if the insured is partly at fault.
C) To exclude certain types of damage from insurance coverage
D) To share the risk between the insurer and the insured

Gibert Technologies has developed a cellphone that is very similar in appearance to the iPhone. What tort may Gibert have committed?

Question 45 options:

A) passing off
B) inducement of breach of contract
C) product defamation
D) proprietary trespass

In a negligence action, you must determine what a reasonable person would have done and then compare that to the defendant's conduct. This isknown as:

Question 46 options:

A) Policy considerations
B) Duty of care
C) Causation
D) Standard of care

Under negligence, the "but for" test under causation means:

Question 47 options:

A) The plaintiff's responsibility for their own loss
B) The standard to which we hold the defendant
C) If the plaintiff would have suffered the harm anyway then the defendant is not liable
D) If the plaintiff would not have suffered the harm anyway then the defendant is not liable

Which of the following is true regarding appeals?

Question 48 options:

A) All appeals are dealt with by the Alberta Court of Appeal
B) You need the Supreme Court of Canada's permission (known as "leave") to appeal to it
C) The Court level where the trial took place will hear the appeal
D) You always appeal from the Alberta Court of Appeal to the Federal Court of Appeal

Neither Jeremy nor Jayson could afford the $60 ticket price for the RTG concert, but they were determined to go nonetheless. They were humiliated when they were apprehended shortly after sneaking in through a side entrance, charged, and sternly escorted from the building. What is the most likely infraction arising from these circumstances?

Question 49 options:

A) trespass to land
B) libel
C) defamation of character
D) negligence

Which of the following is the role of the Judicial Branch of government?

Question 50 options:

A) Interpret the law and resolve disputes
B) Elected representatives vote on bills to become laws
C) The Office of the Prime Minister
D) Formulate policy

Under negligence, remoteness is concerned with

Question 51 options:

A) The type of harm that the plaintiff suffered
B) The relationship between the plaintiff and the defendant
C) The defendant's carelessness
D) The failure of the defendant to act reasonably

When the Court awards compensation for damage to which a precise dollar amount cannot be calculated, these are known as:

Question 52 options:

A) General damages
B) Pecuniary damages
C) Aggravated damages
D) Special damages

You own a grocery store in Alberta. One day, an orange falls off a display in the produce section and an employee, hauling a particularly heavy load of produce, squashes the orange under the wheel of his produce cart, leaving a puddle of orange juice on the floor. The puddle is promptly mopped up and a "Caution: wet floor sign" is posted directly on the part of the floor that is still wet. Sasha, distracted by her phone, enters the store. She is very familiar with the store's layout and proceeds directly to the produce section to pick out some oranges, all without looking away from her phone. She doesn't see the wet floor sign and slips and falls on the still-wet part of the floor, breaking her hip. Sasha decides to sue you.

Question 53 options:

A) You are liable because you breached the standard of care
B) You are not liable because you did everything you reasonably could to reduce the danger
C) You are liable because the plaintiff suffered harm
D) You are not liable because Sasha was a licensee

What is the reason for strict limitation periods?

Question 54 options:

A) They establish upper financial limits on liability for defendants.
B) They prevent plaintiffs from advancing old claims in which evidence may have been lost because of the passage of time.
C) There are no limitation periods
D) They provide useful guidelines for when to commence litigation.

In what way does a civil law system differ from a common law system?

Question 55 options:

A) Judges in a civil law system are not bound by how other judges have interpreted the Civil Code.
B) Judges in a civil law system must apply a relevant provision of the Civil Code, even if doing so would produce an unjust outcome.
C) In a civil law system, provinces have jurisdiction to appoint judges to superior courts.
D) In a civil law system, tort and contract laws are established by precedent.

Which of the following is typically not a feature of Alternative Dispute Resolution?

Question 56 options:

A) It may be less time-consuming
B) It is typically a winner-take-all resolution
C) It may preserve confidentiality
D) It may be less costly

Which of the following best describes insurance?

Question 57 options:

A) A cornerstone of an effective risk management program
B) A loss of integrity among directors and officers of large corporate institutions
C) Effective against all risks
D) Exorbitant

Why are provincial governments unable to pass criminal laws?

Question 58 options:

A) The doctrine of paramountcy dictates that the federal government law making power overrides provincially enacted laws
B) Criminal laws can be enacted by the federal and provincial legislative branches of government.
C) Criminal laws are part of the Constitution and cannot be modified by the legislative branch.
D) Criminal law falls under federal jurisdiction.

Under negligence, why does the defence of "Voluntary Assumption of Risk" rarely succeed?

Question 59 options:

A) The defendant must show the plaintiff's losses were purely economic in nature.
B) The defendant must prove the defence beyond a reasonable doubt.
C) The defendant must prove the plaintiff assumed the legal risk.
D) The defendant show the plaintiff was committing a crime at the time of the loss.

Which of the following is an example of public law?

Question 60 options:

A) Tort law
B) Criminal Law
C) Contract law
D) Employment law

You are being sued and intend to defend yourself. How should you respond being served a Statement of Claim?

Question 61 options:

A) File pleadings
B) File a counterclaim
C) File a statement of defence
D) File a statement of claim

Chemical Industries is suing a customer for non-payment of its account and will bring its lawsuit in provincial court. What is the name of the document that Chemical will use to commence its lawsuit?

Question 62 options:

A) Statement of claim
B) Statement of demand
C) Civil Demand
D) Petition

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access with AI-Powered Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

International financial management

Authors: Jeff Madura

12th edition

1133947832, 978-1305195011, 978-1133947837

Students also viewed these Law questions