Under the Communications Act, the Federal Communications Commission may not impose common carrier obligations on cable operators A common carrier is one that makes a public offering to provide communication facilities whereby all members of the public who choose to employ such facilities may communicate or transmit In May 1976, the Commission issued rules requiring cable television systems of a designated size to develop a minimum ten channel capacity by 1986 to makeavailable on a first come, nondiscriminatory basis certain channels for access by third parties and to furnish equipment and facilities for such access The purpose of these rules was to ensure public access to the cable systems Midwest Video Corporation claimed that the access rules exceeded the Commission's jurisdiction granted it by the Communications Act, because the rules infringe upon the cable systems' journalistic freedom by in effect treating the cable operators as common carriers The Commission contended that its expansive mandate under the Communications Act to supervise and regulate broadcasting encompassed the access rules Did the Commission exceed its authority under the Act Why or why not

The Answer is in the image, click to view ...

Answered step by step

Verified Expert Solution

Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

Posted on Jul 05, 2024

Under the Communications Act, the Federal Communications Commission may not impose common carrier obligations on cable operators. A common carrier is one that "makes a public offering to provide [communication facilities] whereby all members of the public who choose to employ such facilities may communicate or transmit." In May 1976, the Commission issued rules requiring cable television systems of a designated size
to develop a minimum ten-channel capacity by 1986;
to makeavailable on a first-come, nondiscriminatory basis certain channels for access by third parties; and
to furnish equipment and facilities for such access.
The purpose of these rules was to ensure public access to the cable systems. Midwest Video Corporation claimed that the access rules exceeded the Commission's jurisdiction granted it by the Communications Act, because the rules infringe upon the cable systems' journalistic freedom by in effect treating the cable operators as "common carriers." The Commission contended that its expansive mandate under the Communications Act to supervise and regulate broadcasting encompassed the access rules. Did the Commission exceed its authority under the Act? Why or why not?