uring the first week of May toward the end of the school year, a teacher sent a student to the office because the teacher had concerns about a message emblazoned on the student's t-shirt. On one side, the T-shirt read, \"celebrate diversity.\" On the other side, the T-shirt spelled out, \"love.\" However, the images used to make the letters consisted of a variety of handguns, rifles, and other weapons. The teacher thought the shirt might be viewed as threatening by other students. The student didn't understand why they were sent to the office and claimed that they wore the T-shirt several times throughout the year without any problems. The school's dress code did not specifically prohibit the wearing of T-shirts with images of weapons, yet school officials stated that they had broad authority to prohibit the wearing of the shirt due to their fear that others might be traumatized by the images. The student refused to turn the t-shirt inside out or to change clothes, so they were placed in an in-school suspension (ISS) cubicle for the remainder of the day and were told not to wear the shirt at school again. The student, however, continued to wear the shirt and, each time, they were removed from class and placed in ISS. Do school officials have the authority to punish the student by continuing to place the student in ISS? If so, how would school officials justify their actions? If the student filed suit claiming violations of their First Amendment rights, would they be successful? Apply all of the legal tests used by federal courts to analyze the student's claim