Use Edmunds et al. (2006). Table 1: What is the strength and direction of the relationship between external regulation and autonomy via exercise? Oa. Positive Relationship Ob. Negative Relationship c. No Relationship Od. Weak Relationship Oe. Moderate Relationship Of. Strong Relationship Og. Near Perfect Relationship Oh. Perfect Relationship 8 EDMUNDS ET AL. Table 1 Reliability Analyses, Descriptive Statistics, and Pearson Correlations for Age, Gender, Psychological Need Satisfaction Via Exercise, Motivational Regulations for Exercise, and Exercise Behaviors d M SD 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1. Age 31.86 11.28 - 2. Gender .05 3. Autonomy via exercise 65 5.49 0.82 .09 -101 4. Relatedness via exercise 85 5.10 1.15-15-08 5. Competence via exercise .65 5.02 0.95 -17.14** 6. External regulation 37** 45** 52** ,70 1.30 0.48.08 -.05 7. Introjected regulation -.12** -22 8. Identified regulation 9. Intrinsic motivation. 10. Mild exercise 11. Moderate exercise .74 1.96 0.89-18** .09 .78 3.47 0.90.15** .05 .92 3.55 1.02.13 .00 -17.00 .01 15** .14** 40 26 34 35** 02 7.59 9.31 .06 14.51 19.82 .01 12. Strenuous exercise 35.17 30.93 .11 10 34** -15** .02 .05 11.01 17 57.28 36.83-27** -.04 .16** 15 47** -.09 -.02 -.06 -.05 .38** -.09 .29** .08 20 14"* .14** .64** .09 -.00 07 -.01 .00 -.00 20 28 41 33** -.10 -.08) 32 27 28 52** .77** 13. Total exercise Note. N 369. Reliability estimates are Cronbach's alphas. *p