Use Harvard Referencing to fully reference, in-text reference and cite this essay.

4.1Some people believe that what is right and wrong is the same for all people, places and time, while others believe that it varies depending on the situation. There is no correct or incorrect answer, but it is an important one to consider.

There are a variety of different views on this topic, and there is no single answer that is universally agreed upon. However, there are a few general points that can be made about this topic.

First, it is important to note that there is a difference between what is right and what is wrong, and what is morally good and what is morally bad. What is right or wrong refers to actions that are considered to be either positive or negative in nature.

For example, killing someone is generally considered to be wrong, while helping someone is generally considered to be right. On the other hand, what is morally good or bad refers to the character or quality of an action. For example, an action might be morally good if it is done for the right reasons, even if it is not necessarily right or wrong in itself.

Second, it is also important to note that there is a difference between what is right and what is legal. Just because something is legal does not always imply that it is correct. For example, slavery was legal in many parts of the world for centuries, but that does not mean that it was right. Similarly, there are many things that are not legal but are still morally acceptable, such as helping a friend in need.

Third, it is important to realize that what is right or wrong can vary depending on the culture and the time period. What is considered to be right or wrong in one culture may not be considered to be the same in another culture. For example, in some cultures, it is considered to be wrong to eat meat, while in others, it is considered to be perfectly acceptable. Similarly, what is considered to be right or wrong can also change over time. What was once considered to be morally acceptable may no longer be considered to be so in the future.

Finally, it is important to remember that there is no single answer to the question of what is right and wrong. What one person may consider to be right may not be considered to be so by another person. This is because different people have different values and beliefs, and what is important to one person may not be as important to another. As a result, it is impossible to say definitively what is right and wrong for all people, places, and times.

4.2.1The options are to either do nothing and let the trolley hit the five people, or to push the person in front of the trolley onto the tracks, killing them but saving the five people.

4.2.2

The option to do nothing and let the trolley hit the five people is grounded in the moral theory of utilitarianism. This theory states that the morally right thing to do is the one that will produce the greatest amount of good for the greatest number of people. In this case, doing nothing causes the least amount of harm because only five people are killed.

Doing nothing and letting the trolley hit the five people would be in line with utilitarianism, as it would lead to the greatest amount of happiness for the greatest number of people. Pushing the person in front of the trolley would be consistent with Kantianism, as it would be an act of sacrificial altruism performed for the benefit of others without regard for personal gain.

4.2.3

I would push the person in front of the trolley, as I believe that it is better to save as many lives as possible, even if it means sacrificing one life.