Use the questions below to help guide you as you describe and evaluate your journal article You do not have to answer all of the questions but make sure you describe both the content of the article and provide your evaluation of the content Please answer your questions in a reflective essay format https www proquest com docview 2622346732 accountid 10352 parentSessionId aMrZkaSf1vwNBofteMy2eKPKQ 2FTL3k1CwCj3Gh7mH0s 3D pq origsite primo use the questions to guide you answer Describe the content of the article 1 What was the main idea(s) or question(s) the authors were trying to investigate 2 Does the review evaluate existing research Has the author explained why particular studies and sets of findings are strong and convincing OR weak and unconvincing 3 What were the hypotheses 4 What was the theoretical explanation for the proposed hypotheses 5 Who were the participants How many of them were recruited How were they recruited 6 What measures tests were used to assess the variables of interest 7 What were the main results of the study Did the results support the hypotheses or not Evaluate the content provided in the article 1 What are the strengths of the methods used in study 2 What are the limitations of the methods used What could or should have been done differently and why 3 What are the strengths and or limitations of the sample they used Was the sample representative of the population and appropriate for the topic 4 What was the most interesting or important finding What did you find interesting about it How does this finding add to scientific knowledge about this topic 5 Are there any useful applications that could result from this study (i e , is there any way these findings could be useful to people in the real world) What are they 6 What future research should be done on this topic Can you briefly describe a study that could extend the research 7 What information in the article was confusing or unclear What other information would be useful to help clarify this

The Answer is in the image, click to view ...

Answered step by step

Verified Expert Solution

Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

Posted on May 22, 2024

Use the questions below to help guide you as you describe and evaluate your journal article. You do not have to answer all of the

Use the questions below to help guide you as you describe and evaluate your journal article. You do not have to answer all of the questions but make sure you describe both the content of the article and provide your evaluation of the content. Please answer your questions in a reflective essay format

https://www.proquest.com/docview/2622346732?accountid=10352&parentSessionId=aMrZkaSf1vwNBofteMy2eKPKQ%2FTL3k1CwCj3Gh7mH0s%3D&pq-origsite=primo

use the questions to guide you answer Describe the content of the article: 1. What was the main idea(s) or question(s) the authors were trying to investigate? 2. Does the review evaluate existing research? Has the author explained why particular studies and sets of findings are strong and convincing OR weak and unconvincing? 3. What were the hypotheses? 4. What was the theoretical explanation for the proposed hypotheses? 5. Who were the participants? How many of them were recruited? How were they recruited? 6. What measures/tests were used to assess the variables of interest? 7. What were the main results of the study? Did the results support the hypotheses or not?

Evaluate the content provided in the article. 1. What are the strengths of the methods used in study? 2. What are the limitations of the methods used? What could or should have been done differently and why? 3. What are the strengths and/or limitations of the sample they used? Was the sample representative of the population and appropriate for the topic? 4. What was the most interesting or important finding? What did you find interesting about it? How does this finding add to scientific knowledge about this topic? 5. Are there any useful applications that could result from this study (i.e., is there any way these findings could be useful to people in the real world)? What are they? 6. What future research should be done on this topic? Can you briefly describe a study that could extend the research? 7. What information in the article was confusing or unclear? What other information would be useful to help clarify this?