Use these numbers to fill in the missing numbers below Test 1 pre test (M 29 25, SD 7 89) to post test (M 30 13, SD 8 08) t (23) 1 00, p 164 test 2 F(4, 130) 2 60, p 04 art (M 35 88, SD 3 66), mindfulness (M 40 00, SD 7 83), nature (M 38 38 SD 5 08), music (M 36 36, SD 9 43), control (M 40 50, SD 5 27) test 3 F(1, 52) 04, p 85 pre test (M 5 63, SD 1 24) to post test (M 6 25, SD 1 24) main effect F(1,52) 11 28, p 001 simple effect F(1, 23) 3 01 p 096 test 4 F(1, 50) 1 56, p 22 Results Differences in state stress within conditions (YOUR INTERVENTION vs CONTROL) VARIABLES Pre test state stress vs Post test state stress TYPE OF ANALYSES Repeated measures t test YOUR INTERVENTION There were no significant differences in pre test ( M , SD ) and post test ( M , SD ) state stress in the YOUR INTERVENTION condition, t ( ) , p WRITE UP A within subjects t tests was conducted to examine pre and post test differences in state stress In the YOUR INTERVENTION condition, there was a statistically significant difference in pre test ( M , SD ) and post test ( M , SD )) state stress in the YOUR INTERVENTION condition, t ( ) , p VARIABLE PERCEIVED STRESS SCALE (PSS) TYPE OF ANALYSES Between subjects ANOVA YOUR INTERVENTION5 ( if p 05 ) There were no differences in trait stress between conditions, F (, ) , p Specifically, there were no differences in trait stress among participants randomly assigned into YOUR INTERVENTION condition ( M , SD ) and the CONTROL condition ( M , SD ) ( if p 05 ) There were differences in trait stress between conditions, F (, ) , p Specifically, there were statistically significant differences in trait stress among participants randomly assigned into the art ( M , SD ), mindfulness ( M XX XX , SD XX XX), XX, XX, XXX condition All other comparisons were not statistically significant WRITE UP A between subject one way ANOVA was conducted to examine baseline differences in trait stress across conditions There were no differences in state stress between conditions, F (, ) , p Specifically, there were no differences in trait stress among participants randomly assigned into YOUR INTERVENTION condition ( M , SD ) and the CONTROL condition ( M , SD ) VARIABLE INTERVENTION CONDITION DST PRE TEST AND DST POST TEST (Verbal Working Memory) TYPE OF ANALYSES Mixed ANOVA YOUR INTERVENTION ( ) INTERACTION EFFECT ( if p 05 ) The two way interaction effect for the 2 x 2 mixed ANOVA was not statistically significant, F ( , ) , p ( if p 05 ) The interaction effect for the 2 x 2 mixed ANOVA was not statistically significant, F (, ) , p However, the main effect was statistically significant, F ( , ) , p Therefore, pre test and post test scores on the DST were examined within each condition In the YOUR INTERVENTION condition, scores on the DST significantly increased from pre test ( M , SD ) to post test ( M , SD ), F ( , ) , p In the CONTROL condition, scores on the DST did not significantly increase from pre test ( M , SD ) to post test ( M , SD ), F ( , ) , p (2) MAIN EFFECT ( if p 05 ) The main effect for the 2 x 2 mixed ANOVA was statistically significant, F ( , ) , p VARIABLE INTERVENTION AND CONDITION DST PRE TEST AND DST POST TEST (Verbal Working Memory) MODERATOR TYPE OF ANALYSES Mixed ANOVA YOUR INTERVENTION ( if p 05 ) The three way interaction effect for the 2 x 2 x 2 mixed ANOVA was not statistically significant, F ( , ) , p ( if p 05 ) The three way interaction effect for the 2 x 2 x 2 mixed ANOVA was statistically significant, F ( , ) , p Therefore, two 2 x 2 mixed ANOVAs were conducted at each level of the moderator The interaction effect for the 2 x 2 mixed ANOVA for females was statistically significant, F ( , ) , p Therefore, pre test and post test scores on the DST were examined within each condition for female participants In the YOUR INTERVENTION condition, scores on the DST significantly increased from pre test ( M , SD ) to post test ( M , SD ) for females, F ( , ) , p 01 In the CONTROL condition, scores on the DST did not significantly increased from pre test ( M , SD ) to post test for females ( M , SD ), F ( , ) 23 00, p 50 WRITE UP A 2 x 2 x 2 mixed ANOVA was conducted to examine differences in pre test and post test DST scores across conditions and between YOUR MODERATOR The three way interaction effect for the 2 x 2 x 2 mixed ANOVA was not statistically significant, F ( , ) , p Differences in Trait Stress (across all interventions and control condition) (H1) 2 x 2 mixed ANOVA WRITE UP A 2 x 2 mixed ANOVA was conducted to examine differences in pre test and post test DST scores across conditions The two way interaction effect for the 2 x 2 mixed ANOVA was not statistically significant, F ( , ) , p WRITE UP A 2 x 2 mixed ANOVA was conducted to examine differences in pre test and post test DST scores across conditions The interaction effect for the 2 x 2 mixed ANOVA was statistically significant, F ( , ) , p Therefore, pre test and post test scores on the DST were examined within each condition In the YOUR INTERVENTION condition, scores on the DST significantly increased decreased from pre test ( M , SD ) to post test ( M , SD ), F ( , ) , p 000 In the CONTROL condition, scores on the DST did not significantly increase from pre test ( M , SD ) to post test ( M , SD ), F ( , ) , p WRITE UP The main effect for the 2 x 2 mixed ANOVA was statistically significant, F ( , ) , p Thus, differences in verbal working memory before and after the intervention were examined The findings from the examination of the simple effects output indicated that verbal working memory increased decreased after the intervention, and that the increase decrease in verbal working memory was (or was not) statistically significant (H2) 2 x 2 x 2 mixed ANOVA The two way interaction effect for the 2 x 2 mixed ANOVA for participants who liked art was statistically significant, F ( , ) , p Therefore, pre test and post test scores on the DST were examined within each condition for participants who liked art In the art condition, scores on the DST significantly decreased from pre test ( M , SD ) to post test ( M , SD ) for those that liked art, F ( , ) , p In the CONTROL condition, scores on the DST did not significantly increase from pre test ( M , SD ) to post test ( M , SD ) for those who liked art , F ( , ) , p The two way interaction effect for the 3 x 2 mixed ANOVA for females was statistically significant, F ( , ) , p

The Answer is in the image, click to view ...

Answered step by step

Verified Expert Solution

Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

Posted on Oct 11, 2024

Use these numbers to fill in the missing numbers below: Test 1 pre-test (M = 29.25, SD = 7.89) to post-test (M = 30.13, SD

Use these numbers to fill in the missing numbers below:

Test 1

pre-test (M = 29.25, SD = 7.89) to post-test (M = 30.13, SD = 8.08) t (23) = -1.00, p = .164 test 2 F(4, 130) = 2.60, p = .04. art (M = 35.88, SD = 3.66), mindfulness (M = 40.00, SD = 7.83), nature (M = 38.38 SD = 5.08), music (M = 36.36, SD = 9.43), control (M = 40.50, SD = 5.27) test 3 F(1, 52) = .04, p = .85. pre-test (M = 5.63, SD = 1.24) to post-test (M = 6.25, SD = 1.24) main effect F(1,52) = 11.28, p = .001. simple effect F(1, 23) 3.01 p = .096 test 4 F(1, 50) = 1.56, p = .22.

Results

Differences in state stress within conditions (YOUR INTERVENTION vs CONTROL)

VARIABLES

Pre-test state stress vs. Post-test state stress

TYPE OF ANALYSES

Repeated measures t-test

YOUR INTERVENTION

There were no significant differences in pre-test (M = ., SD= .) and post-test (M = . , SD= .) state stress in the YOUR INTERVENTION condition, t( ) = ., p = . .

WRITE UP

A within-subjects t-tests was conducted to examine pre- and post-test differences in state stress. In the YOUR INTERVENTION condition, there was a statistically significant difference in pre-test (M = . , SD= .) and post-test (M = . , SD= .)) state stress in the YOUR INTERVENTION condition, t( ) = ., p = . .

VARIABLE

PERCEIVED STRESS SCALE (PSS)

TYPE OF ANALYSES

Between-subjects ANOVA

YOUR INTERVENTION5

(if p > .05) There were no differences in trait stress between conditions, F(, ) = . , p = . . Specifically, there were no differences in trait stress among participants randomly assigned into YOUR INTERVENTION condition (M = . , SD= .) and the CONTROL condition (M = . , SD=.).

(if p < .05) There were differences in trait stress between conditions, F(, ) = . , p = . . Specifically, there were statistically significant differences in trait stress among participants randomly assigned into the art (M = . , SD = .), mindfulness (M = XX.XX , SD= XX.XX), XX, XX, XXX condition. All other comparisons were not statistically significant.

WRITE UP

A between-subject one-way ANOVA was conducted to examine baseline differences in trait stress across conditions. There were no differences in state stress between conditions, F(, ) = ., p = . . Specifically, there were no differences in trait stress among participants randomly assigned into YOUR INTERVENTION condition (M = . , SD= .) and the CONTROL condition (M = . , SD=. ).

VARIABLE

INTERVENTION CONDITION

DST PRE-TEST AND DST POST-TEST (Verbal Working Memory)

TYPE OF ANALYSES

Mixed ANOVA

YOUR INTERVENTION

( ) INTERACTION EFFECT

(if p > .05) The two-way interaction effect for the 2 x 2 mixed ANOVA was not statistically significant, F( , ) = . , p = . .

(if p < .05) The interaction effect for the 2 x 2 mixed ANOVA was not statistically significant, F(, ) = . , p = . . However, the main effect was statistically significant, F( , ) = . , p = . . Therefore, pre-test and post-test scores on the DST were examined within each condition. In the YOUR INTERVENTION condition, scores on the DST significantly increased from pre-test (M = . . , SD= . ) to post-test (M = . , SD= . ), F( , ) = . , p = . . In the CONTROL condition, scores on the DST did not significantly increase from pre-test (M = . , SD= . ) to post-test (M = . , SD= . ), F( , ) = . , p = . .

(2) MAIN EFFECT
(if p < .05) The main effect for the 2 x 2 mixed ANOVA was statistically significant, F( , ) = . , p = . .
VARIABLE
1. INTERVENTION AND CONDITION
2. DST PRE-TEST AND DST POST-TEST (Verbal Working Memory)
3. MODERATOR
TYPE OF ANALYSES
1. Mixed ANOVA
YOUR INTERVENTION
1. (if p > .05) The three-way interaction effect for the 2 x 2 x 2 mixed ANOVA was not statistically significant, F( , ) = . , p = . .
2. (if p < .05) The three-way interaction effect for the 2 x 2 x 2 mixed ANOVA was statistically significant, F( , ) = . , p = . . Therefore, two 2 x 2 mixed ANOVAs were conducted at each level of the moderator.
  1. The interaction effect for the 2 x 2 mixed ANOVA for females was statistically significant, F( , ) = . , p = . . Therefore, pre-test and post-test scores on the DST were examined within each condition for female participants. In the YOUR INTERVENTION condition, scores on the DST significantly increased from pre-test (M = . , SD= . ) to post-test (M = . , SD= . ) for females, F( , ) = . , p = .01. In the CONTROL condition, scores on the DST did not significantly increased from pre-test (M = . , SD= . ) to post-test for females (M = . , SD= . ), F( , ) = 23.00, p = .50.
WRITE UP
1. A 2 x 2 x 2 mixed ANOVA was conducted to examine differences in pre-test and post-test DST scores across conditions and between YOUR MODERATOR . The three-way interaction effect for the 2 x 2 x 2 mixed ANOVA was not statistically significant, F( , ) = . , p = . .
Differences in Trait Stress (across all interventions and control condition)
(H1) 2 x 2 mixed ANOVA
WRITE UP - A 2 x 2 mixed ANOVA was conducted to examine differences in pre-test and post-test DST scores across conditions. The two-way interaction effect for the 2 x 2 mixed ANOVA was not statistically significant, F( , ) = . , p = . .
WRITE UP- A 2 x 2 mixed ANOVA was conducted to examine differences in pre-test and post-test DST scores across conditions. The interaction effect for the 2 x 2 mixed ANOVA was statistically significant, F( , ) = . , p = . . Therefore, pre-test and post-test scores on the DST were examined within each condition. In the YOUR INTERVENTION condition, scores on the DST significantly increased/decreased from pre-test (M = . , SD= . ) to post-test (M = . , SD= . ), F( , ) = . , p = .000. In the CONTROL condition, scores on the DST did not significantly increase from pre-test (M = . , SD= . ) to post-test (M = . , SD= . ), F( , ) = . , p = . .
WRITE UP - The main effect for the 2 x 2 mixed ANOVA was statistically significant, F( , ) = . , p = . . Thus, differences in verbal working memory before and after the intervention were examined. The findings from the examination of the simple effects output indicated that verbal working memory increased/decreased after the intervention, and that the increase/decrease in verbal working memory was (or was not) statistically significant.
(H2) 2 x 2 x 2 mixed ANOVA
The two-way interaction effect for the 2 x 2 mixed ANOVA for participants who liked art was statistically significant, F( , ) = . , p = . .
Therefore, pre-test and post-test scores on the DST were examined within each condition for participants who liked art. In the art condition, scores on the DST significantly decreased from pre-test (M = . , SD= . ) to post-test (M = . , SD= . ) for those that liked art, F( , ) = . , p = . . In the CONTROL condition, scores on the DST did not significantly increase from pre-test (M = . , SD= . ) to post-test (M = . , SD= . ) for those who liked art , F( , ) = . , p = . .
The two-way interaction effect for the 3 x 2 mixed ANOVA for females was statistically significant, F( , ) = . , p = . .