Question
Use these numbers to fill in the missing numbers below: Test 1 pre-test (M = 29.25, SD = 7.89) to post-test (M = 30.13, SD
Use these numbers to fill in the missing numbers below:
Test 1
pre-test (M = 29.25, SD = 7.89) to post-test (M = 30.13, SD = 8.08) t (23) = -1.00, p = .164 test 2 F(4, 130) = 2.60, p = .04. art (M = 35.88, SD = 3.66), mindfulness (M = 40.00, SD = 7.83), nature (M = 38.38 SD = 5.08), music (M = 36.36, SD = 9.43), control (M = 40.50, SD = 5.27) test 3 F(1, 52) = .04, p = .85. pre-test (M = 5.63, SD = 1.24) to post-test (M = 6.25, SD = 1.24) main effect F(1,52) = 11.28, p = .001. simple effect F(1, 23) 3.01 p = .096 test 4 F(1, 50) = 1.56, p = .22.
Results
Differences in state stress within conditions (YOUR INTERVENTION vs CONTROL)
VARIABLES
Pre-test state stress vs. Post-test state stress
TYPE OF ANALYSES
Repeated measures t-test
YOUR INTERVENTION
There were no significant differences in pre-test (M = ., SD= .) and post-test (M = . , SD= .) state stress in the YOUR INTERVENTION condition, t( ) = ., p = . .
WRITE UP
A within-subjects t-tests was conducted to examine pre- and post-test differences in state stress. In the YOUR INTERVENTION condition, there was a statistically significant difference in pre-test (M = . , SD= .) and post-test (M = . , SD= .)) state stress in the YOUR INTERVENTION condition, t( ) = ., p = . .
VARIABLE
PERCEIVED STRESS SCALE (PSS)
TYPE OF ANALYSES
Between-subjects ANOVA
YOUR INTERVENTION5
(if p > .05) There were no differences in trait stress between conditions, F(, ) = . , p = . . Specifically, there were no differences in trait stress among participants randomly assigned into YOUR INTERVENTION condition (M = . , SD= .) and the CONTROL condition (M = . , SD=.).
(if p < .05) There were differences in trait stress between conditions, F(, ) = . , p = . . Specifically, there were statistically significant differences in trait stress among participants randomly assigned into the art (M = . , SD = .), mindfulness (M = XX.XX , SD= XX.XX), XX, XX, XXX condition. All other comparisons were not statistically significant.
WRITE UP
A between-subject one-way ANOVA was conducted to examine baseline differences in trait stress across conditions. There were no differences in state stress between conditions, F(, ) = ., p = . . Specifically, there were no differences in trait stress among participants randomly assigned into YOUR INTERVENTION condition (M = . , SD= .) and the CONTROL condition (M = . , SD=. ).
VARIABLE
INTERVENTION CONDITION
DST PRE-TEST AND DST POST-TEST (Verbal Working Memory)
TYPE OF ANALYSES
Mixed ANOVA
YOUR INTERVENTION
( ) INTERACTION EFFECT
(if p > .05) The two-way interaction effect for the 2 x 2 mixed ANOVA was not statistically significant, F( , ) = . , p = . .
(if p < .05) The interaction effect for the 2 x 2 mixed ANOVA was not statistically significant, F(, ) = . , p = . . However, the main effect was statistically significant, F( , ) = . , p = . . Therefore, pre-test and post-test scores on the DST were examined within each condition. In the YOUR INTERVENTION condition, scores on the DST significantly increased from pre-test (M = . . , SD= . ) to post-test (M = . , SD= . ), F( , ) = . , p = . . In the CONTROL condition, scores on the DST did not significantly increase from pre-test (M = . , SD= . ) to post-test (M = . , SD= . ), F( , ) = . , p = . .
- (2) MAIN EFFECT
- (if p < .05) The main effect for the 2 x 2 mixed ANOVA was statistically significant, F( , ) = . , p = . .
- VARIABLE
- INTERVENTION AND CONDITION
- DST PRE-TEST AND DST POST-TEST (Verbal Working Memory)
- MODERATOR
- TYPE OF ANALYSES
- Mixed ANOVA
- YOUR INTERVENTION
- (if p > .05) The three-way interaction effect for the 2 x 2 x 2 mixed ANOVA was not statistically significant, F( , ) = . , p = . .
- (if p < .05) The three-way interaction effect for the 2 x 2 x 2 mixed ANOVA was statistically significant, F( , ) = . , p = . . Therefore, two 2 x 2 mixed ANOVAs were conducted at each level of the moderator.
- The interaction effect for the 2 x 2 mixed ANOVA for females was statistically significant, F( , ) = . , p = . . Therefore, pre-test and post-test scores on the DST were examined within each condition for female participants. In the YOUR INTERVENTION condition, scores on the DST significantly increased from pre-test (M = . , SD= . ) to post-test (M = . , SD= . ) for females, F( , ) = . , p = .01. In the CONTROL condition, scores on the DST did not significantly increased from pre-test (M = . , SD= . ) to post-test for females (M = . , SD= . ), F( , ) = 23.00, p = .50.
- WRITE UP
- A 2 x 2 x 2 mixed ANOVA was conducted to examine differences in pre-test and post-test DST scores across conditions and between YOUR MODERATOR . The three-way interaction effect for the 2 x 2 x 2 mixed ANOVA was not statistically significant, F( , ) = . , p = . .
- Differences in Trait Stress (across all interventions and control condition)
- (H1) 2 x 2 mixed ANOVA
- WRITE UP - A 2 x 2 mixed ANOVA was conducted to examine differences in pre-test and post-test DST scores across conditions. The two-way interaction effect for the 2 x 2 mixed ANOVA was not statistically significant, F( , ) = . , p = . .
- WRITE UP- A 2 x 2 mixed ANOVA was conducted to examine differences in pre-test and post-test DST scores across conditions. The interaction effect for the 2 x 2 mixed ANOVA was statistically significant, F( , ) = . , p = . . Therefore, pre-test and post-test scores on the DST were examined within each condition. In the YOUR INTERVENTION condition, scores on the DST significantly increased/decreased from pre-test (M = . , SD= . ) to post-test (M = . , SD= . ), F( , ) = . , p = .000. In the CONTROL condition, scores on the DST did not significantly increase from pre-test (M = . , SD= . ) to post-test (M = . , SD= . ), F( , ) = . , p = . .
- WRITE UP - The main effect for the 2 x 2 mixed ANOVA was statistically significant, F( , ) = . , p = . . Thus, differences in verbal working memory before and after the intervention were examined. The findings from the examination of the simple effects output indicated that verbal working memory increased/decreased after the intervention, and that the increase/decrease in verbal working memory was (or was not) statistically significant.
- (H2) 2 x 2 x 2 mixed ANOVA
- The two-way interaction effect for the 2 x 2 mixed ANOVA for participants who liked art was statistically significant, F( , ) = . , p = . .
- Therefore, pre-test and post-test scores on the DST were examined within each condition for participants who liked art. In the art condition, scores on the DST significantly decreased from pre-test (M = . , SD= . ) to post-test (M = . , SD= . ) for those that liked art, F( , ) = . , p = . . In the CONTROL condition, scores on the DST did not significantly increase from pre-test (M = . , SD= . ) to post-test (M = . , SD= . ) for those who liked art , F( , ) = . , p = . .
- The two-way interaction effect for the 3 x 2 mixed ANOVA for females was statistically significant, F( , ) = . , p = . .
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started