(Using external sources to support your assertions) In regards to the "Seila Law v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau"case, and the concepts of "separation of powers" and "agency functions" :

Part 1: Are the legislative and executive functions of agencies contemplated within the constitutional authority granted the executive and legislative branches? Why or why not?

Part2: Should the CFPB be left as is, disbanded, or restricted in a way that everyone may agree meets constitutional standards?