Using the IRAC Method $($please review your legal writing module$)$ analyze this case study. FACTSWhile Tiger Wild, a famous golfer, was shopping in Value Market, he slipped and fell on a wet floor in one of the aisles. The floor had recently been mopped by one of the store's employees, but there were no signs warning customers that the floor in that area was wet. As a result of the fall, Wild injured his right arm and was unable to play golf for the next three months. Had he been able to play in the scheduled tournaments, he would have earned approximately $$600,000$ over that period of time. Wild filed suit against Value Market for this amount, plus another $$10,000$ in medical expenses.Use the relevant tort law and set up your response in the IRAC format to decide who prevails$\mathrm{.}1-$Decide what legal issue is involved in the case. $($it should clearly identify the applicable law$)$R$-$ Determine what rule of law applies to the issue.A$-$Application of the relevant rule of law to the specific facts of the case you are studying.C$-$ Indicate your conclusion. $($Simple concise statement$)$