Victoria Enterprises inc. is evaluating alternative uses for a three-storey manufacturing and warehousing building that it has purchased for $1,450,000. The company could continue to rent the building to the present occupants for $61,000 per year. These tenants have indicated an interest in staying in the building for at least another 15 years. Alternatively. the company could make improvements to modify the existing structure to use for its own manufacturing and warehousing needs. Victoria's production engineer feels the building could be adapted to handle one of two new product lines. The cost and revenue data for the two product alternatives follow: The building will be used for only 15 years for either product A or product B. After 15 years, the building will be too small for efficient production of either product line. At that time, Victoria plans to rent the building to firms similar to the current occupants. To rent the buliding again. Victoria will need to restore the building to its present layout. The estimated cash cost of restoring the building if product A has been undertaken is $55.000; If product B has been produced, the cash cost will be $80,000. These cash costs can be deducted for tax purposes in the year the expenditures occur. Victorla will depreciate the original building stiell (purchased for $1,450,000 ) at a CCA rate of 5 percent, regarelless of which alternative it chooses. The building modifications are depreciated using the straight line method over a 15 -year life. Equipment purchases for elther product are in class 8 and have a CCA rate of 20 percent. The firm's tax rate is 34 percent, and its required rate of return on such investments is 12 percent. For simplicity, assume all cash flows for a given year occur at the end of the year. The initial outflows for modifications and equipment will occur at t=0, and the restoration outfows will occur at the end of year 15. Also. Victoria has other profitable ongoing operations that are sufficient to cover any losses. (Negotive omount should be indicated by a minus sign. Do not round intermediate calculetions. Round the answers to 2 decimal places. Omit $ sign in your response.) a. Calculate the NPV for Product A The building will be used for only 15 years for elther product A or product B. After 15 years, the bulding will be too small for efficient production of either product line. At that time. Victoria plans to rent the building to firms similar to the current occupants. To rent the building again, Victoria will need to restore the building to its present layout. The estimated cash cost of restoring the building if product A has been undertaken is $55.000; if product B has been produced, the cash cost will be $80,000. These cash costs can be deducted for tax purposes in the year the expenditures occur. Victoria will depreciate the original building shell (purchased for $1,450.000 ) at a CCA rate of 5 percent, regardless of which alternative it chooses. The building modifications are depreciated using the straight-line method over a 15 -year life. Equiprnent purchases for either product are in class 8 and have a CCA rate of 20 percent. The firm's tax rate is 34 percent, and its required rate of return on such investments is 12 percent. For simplicity, assume all cash flows for a given year occur at the end of the yeac. The initial outflows for modifications and equipment will occur at t=0, and the restoration outflows will occur at the end of year 15. Also. Victoria has other profitable ongoing operations that are sufficient to cover any losses. (Negotive amount should be indicated by o minus sign. Do not round intermediote calculations. Round the answers to 2 decimal pleces. Omit $sign in your response.) o. Calculate the NPV for Product A. NPV b. Calculate the NPV for Product B. NPV c. Which use of the buliding would you recommend to management? Pioduct A Product B Rent bulding