Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

Visible question have uploaded in two parts PARTI: NAMES In this week's readings, we discuss the significance of the names that we choose to call

image text in transcribed

Visible question have uploaded in two parts

PARTI: NAMES In this week's readings, we discuss the significance of the names that we choose to call people. Some names are significant because of their historical signific Some names are considered so harmful that they have become 'unspeakable" Several of the "unspeakable" works (or names) are such because they make specific references to names that are tied to demeaning and dehumanizing meanings. Consider words such as the N-Word, as it relates to Black People, the Word or the C-Word as it relates to women and the F-Word or the Q-Word as they relate to the LGBTQ community. Some people believe that the only way to remove the connotative meaning from these words is to reclaim them. This is the case with many individuals, as well as artists such as musicians and comedi What are your thoughts about the power of redaiming these words"? We have seen many, in each of the above-mentioned communities, reclaim these word your journal post, consider the following: Discuss your thoughts about these unspeakables' Have I missed any? What are your thoughts? What will happen with more modem examples of names, such as "Karen" will it ever truly become an "unspeakable"? Why or why not? How it is the same? How is different? Can Should people use epithets and words considered "slurs" to refer to themselves? . Is this really reclaiming the word or is it giving permission to those who will continue to use these words pejoratively? Is this different for regular folks than for artists, musicians, and comedians? If so, why or why not? Can reclaiming over overtake the original offence of the word? Why or why not? Can such words ever become acceptable in specific contexts where they are not epithets? If so, for whom? If not, why not? in your journal, be sure to include references and in text citations to: Chapter 1 Names, in Kent Lewis, "Words that Wound," Emil Sher "The Future Looks Bright" Richard Dawkins, "Don't Call Me That Word, Lawrence Hill Be sure to cite from Lewis, each article, and any additional sources for full grades. Remember, journals are now 500 - 800 words in full APA format, with a representative descriptive title (abbreviated for your running head) in order to allow you more pace and words to provide full answers and explanations in your journal response. PARTI: NAMES In this week's readings, we discuss the significance of the names that we choose to call people. Some names are significant because of their historical signific Some names are considered so harmful that they have become 'unspeakable" Several of the "unspeakable" works (or names) are such because they make specific references to names that are tied to demeaning and dehumanizing meanings. Consider words such as the N-Word, as it relates to Black People, the Word or the C-Word as it relates to women and the F-Word or the Q-Word as they relate to the LGBTQ community. Some people believe that the only way to remove the connotative meaning from these words is to reclaim them. This is the case with many individuals, as well as artists such as musicians and comedi What are your thoughts about the power of redaiming these words"? We have seen many, in each of the above-mentioned communities, reclaim these word your journal post, consider the following: Discuss your thoughts about these unspeakables' Have I missed any? What are your thoughts? What will happen with more modem examples of names, such as "Karen" will it ever truly become an "unspeakable"? Why or why not? How it is the same? How is different? Can Should people use epithets and words considered "slurs" to refer to themselves? . Is this really reclaiming the word or is it giving permission to those who will continue to use these words pejoratively? Is this different for regular folks than for artists, musicians, and comedians? If so, why or why not? Can reclaiming over overtake the original offence of the word? Why or why not? Can such words ever become acceptable in specific contexts where they are not epithets? If so, for whom? If not, why not? in your journal, be sure to include references and in text citations to: Chapter 1 Names, in Kent Lewis, "Words that Wound," Emil Sher "The Future Looks Bright" Richard Dawkins, "Don't Call Me That Word, Lawrence Hill Be sure to cite from Lewis, each article, and any additional sources for full grades. Remember, journals are now 500 - 800 words in full APA format, with a representative descriptive title (abbreviated for your running head) in order to allow you more pace and words to provide full answers and explanations in your journal response

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Finance for Non Financial Managers

Authors: Pierre Bergeron

7th edition

176530835, 978-0176530839

More Books

Students also viewed these Finance questions