Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Question
1 Approved Answer
Visible question have uploaded in two parts PARTI: NAMES In this week's readings, we discuss the significance of the names that we choose to call
Visible question have uploaded in two parts
PARTI: NAMES In this week's readings, we discuss the significance of the names that we choose to call people. Some names are significant because of their historical signific Some names are considered so harmful that they have become 'unspeakable" Several of the "unspeakable" works (or names) are such because they make specific references to names that are tied to demeaning and dehumanizing meanings. Consider words such as the N-Word, as it relates to Black People, the Word or the C-Word as it relates to women and the F-Word or the Q-Word as they relate to the LGBTQ community. Some people believe that the only way to remove the connotative meaning from these words is to reclaim them. This is the case with many individuals, as well as artists such as musicians and comedi What are your thoughts about the power of redaiming these words"? We have seen many, in each of the above-mentioned communities, reclaim these word your journal post, consider the following: Discuss your thoughts about these unspeakables' Have I missed any? What are your thoughts? What will happen with more modem examples of names, such as "Karen" will it ever truly become an "unspeakable"? Why or why not? How it is the same? How is different? Can Should people use epithets and words considered "slurs" to refer to themselves? . Is this really reclaiming the word or is it giving permission to those who will continue to use these words pejoratively? Is this different for regular folks than for artists, musicians, and comedians? If so, why or why not? Can reclaiming over overtake the original offence of the word? Why or why not? Can such words ever become acceptable in specific contexts where they are not epithets? If so, for whom? If not, why not? in your journal, be sure to include references and in text citations to: Chapter 1 Names, in Kent Lewis, "Words that Wound," Emil Sher "The Future Looks Bright" Richard Dawkins, "Don't Call Me That Word, Lawrence Hill Be sure to cite from Lewis, each article, and any additional sources for full grades. Remember, journals are now 500 - 800 words in full APA format, with a representative descriptive title (abbreviated for your running head) in order to allow you more pace and words to provide full answers and explanations in your journal response. PARTI: NAMES In this week's readings, we discuss the significance of the names that we choose to call people. Some names are significant because of their historical signific Some names are considered so harmful that they have become 'unspeakable" Several of the "unspeakable" works (or names) are such because they make specific references to names that are tied to demeaning and dehumanizing meanings. Consider words such as the N-Word, as it relates to Black People, the Word or the C-Word as it relates to women and the F-Word or the Q-Word as they relate to the LGBTQ community. Some people believe that the only way to remove the connotative meaning from these words is to reclaim them. This is the case with many individuals, as well as artists such as musicians and comedi What are your thoughts about the power of redaiming these words"? We have seen many, in each of the above-mentioned communities, reclaim these word your journal post, consider the following: Discuss your thoughts about these unspeakables' Have I missed any? What are your thoughts? What will happen with more modem examples of names, such as "Karen" will it ever truly become an "unspeakable"? Why or why not? How it is the same? How is different? Can Should people use epithets and words considered "slurs" to refer to themselves? . Is this really reclaiming the word or is it giving permission to those who will continue to use these words pejoratively? Is this different for regular folks than for artists, musicians, and comedians? If so, why or why not? Can reclaiming over overtake the original offence of the word? Why or why not? Can such words ever become acceptable in specific contexts where they are not epithets? If so, for whom? If not, why not? in your journal, be sure to include references and in text citations to: Chapter 1 Names, in Kent Lewis, "Words that Wound," Emil Sher "The Future Looks Bright" Richard Dawkins, "Don't Call Me That Word, Lawrence Hill Be sure to cite from Lewis, each article, and any additional sources for full grades. Remember, journals are now 500 - 800 words in full APA format, with a representative descriptive title (abbreviated for your running head) in order to allow you more pace and words to provide full answers and explanations in your journal responseStep by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started