Watermark Corporation manufactures faucets. Several weeks ago, the firm received a special-order inquiry from Vale, Inc. Vale desires to market a faucet similar to Watermark's model no. 55 and has offered to purchase 3,200 units. The following data are available:

Cost data for Watermark's model no. 55 faucet: direct materials, $48; direct labor, $30 (2 hours at $15 per hour); and manufacturing overhead, $70 (2 hours at $35 per hour).

The normal selling price of model no. 55 is $180; however, Vale has offered Watermark only $124 because of the large quantity it is willing to purchase.

Vale requires a modification of the design that will allow a $7 reduction in direct-material cost.

Watermark's production supervisor notes that the company will incur $8,444 in additional set-up costs and will have to purchase a $22,700 special device to manufacture these units. The device will be discarded once the special order is completed.

Total manufacturing overhead costs are applied to production based on direct labor hours. Total budgeted overhead is $840,000. This figure is based on budgeted yearly fixed overhead of $624,000, a budgeted variable overhead of $216,000, and a budgeted activity level of 24,000 direct labor hours.

Watermark will allocate $11,000 of existing fixed administrative costs to the order as part of the cost of doing business.

Required:

(a) One of Watermark's staff accountants wants to reject the special order because financially, it's a loser. Do you agree with this conclusion if Watermark currently has excess capacity? Show calculations to determine the incremental profit or loss on this special order to support your answer.

(b) If Watermark currently has no excess capacity, should the order be rejected? (Assume that Watermark cannot acquire excess capacity via overtime or any other way.) Briefly explain.