Wayne, Erin, Alan and Kirk are all ex-police officers and have decided to start a private security business. Due to tax and ownership issues and the obvious benefits associated with having limited liability, their lawyer recommends that they should register a company for the business. They agree and instruct their lawyer to register a company to be called WEAK Security Pty Ltd. It is agreed that Wayne, Erin, Alan and Kirk will each be allotted 100 ordinary shares in WEAK Security Pty Ltd. After the company is registered, they decide to employ Rodger as a receptionist in the office. Rodger is given strict instructions that he is not to enter into contracts on behalf of the company.

Wanda works in used car sales and a good friend of Rodger. Rodger tells Wanda about his new position at WEAK Security Pty Ltd and mentions that he has been instructed not to enter into any contracts on the companys behalf. Wanda tells Rodger that she has been trying to sell a truck and it would be perfect for the security business. Wanda shows Rodger the truck and lets him drive it. Rodger agrees that the truck would be a great addition to the security business and thinks the price Wanda is asking is very reasonable. Rodger agrees to buy the truck on behalf of WEAK Security Pty Ltd.

Can Wanda rely on any of the assumptions in section 129 of the Corporations Act in order to enforce the contract against WEAK Security Pty Ltd?