Wayne Thomas Carter, Melvin Johns, and Kimberly Thompson were arrested after a police officer observed them through a window bagging cocaine in Mike William's apartment. During the trial in Minnesota state court, the defendants moved to suppress the cocaine as evidence. All admitted that they were short-term guests, and therefore the had a legitimate expectation of privacy in William's home. They also argued the officer's initial observation was an unreasonable search and seizure in violation of their Fourth Amendment rights. Subsequently, they were all convicted on state drug charges. The appellate court found that the officer peering through the window was an unreasonable "search" and so the evidence against Williams was suppressed. Given these facts the court will likely make which of the following decisions as to Williams' three co-defendants? (Mark all that apply) Group of answer choices guests, even short-term guests, have a legitimate right to privacy in another person's home people who are in another person's home for a short time are not protected by the 4th amendment the co-defendants had no standing to challenge the search short-term guests and overnight guests are treated the same way under the 4th Amdnement