We can start on an economically optimal path now, or ignore scholarship, wait a few decades, and then start on an economically optimal path, which will involve more rapid changes. What is accurate about the effect of this choice on the number of coal miners likely to be fired? Group of answer choices Starting now is likely to involve firing more miners because there are many miners now Starting now is likely to involve firing fewer miners because the change will be slower, and many miners will retire as miners All miners will be fired in both cases, so the choice doesn't influence the number of miners fired The starting time has no influence on the number of miners fired No miners will be fired in either case, so the choice doesn't influence the number of miners fired