We discussed various non$-$compensatory decision models. Which of the following is true about these models?

$($Please select one$)$

Note: Please be sure to read the statements extra carefully$--$the details are key.

All non$-$compensatory decision rules rank$-$order attributes by importance

All non$-$compensatory decision rules set a cutoff for every attribute

When using a Conjunctive rule, at least one option gets eliminated from the set

Non$-$compensatory models always lead to one clear winner option

When using the Elimination$-$by$-$Aspect rule, it is possible to end up with a final choice that does not meet the cutoff for some of the attributes