Weight: 50% Instructions Develop a presentation and Word document that explores nursing roles in Australia (RN, EN and NA) using a Coroners Case to highlight ethical, legislative and moral issues. Read through the inquest report into the death of Melissa Stokes (the Coroners Case) and compile a Word document in describe all given questions and a PowerPoint presentation (about 10 to 15 slides) to present the key issues around safe practice, delegation of responsibilities and communication, following the guidelines below Assignment 2 Case study Melissa Stokes.docx Full Coroners report Melissa_Stokes_Findings.pdf Download Melissa_Stokes_Findings.pdf Questions:

1. Introduction including background of the coroners case
2. Continued background to the topic including a description of scope of practice for the RN and EN, NA in Australia
3. Registration process and ongoing requirements for each nursing role
4. Differences in RN and EN and NA role - relying on the coroners case as examples of how each role could have been involved or tasks
5. Ethical issues raised in the coroners case relating to breaches of standards, legislation etc. Ensure to draw back to course content.
6. Role of the RN in the coroners case and a reflection on what the alternative actions could have been by the RN.
7. Personal reflection as to what you have learned from the task.
8. Conclusion - draw together the essence of the presentation, what is the take home message?
9. References

Note that these are not necessarily headings for each slide as they are too long for that purpose. They reflect the content you are expected to address in PowerPoint and describe it in detail in a Word document. Remember to have an introduction slide at the start of the presentation and a slide at the end with your references on it in APA 7 format, please also upload your references in a Word document with in-text citations and references list in APA 7 format. It is expected you will have at least 12-15 references in recent years. Present information in point form in PowerPoint slides; do not put chunks of text on your slides. Do not put too much information on one slide. Instead, use additional slides you may use as many as you like. Use the 7 7 principle for slides as a guide: no more than 7 lines per slide, no more than 7 words per line. In a Word document describe in detail all questions with in-text citations. There are no word limits for this document. Here are some additional resources RUSON at HH Position description - October 2021.pdf Enrolled Nurse - Generic PD-1.pdf Registered Nurse - Epworth Position Description-1.pdf Nurse Asssitant Cabrini Hospital-2.pdf Rubric on the next page, please follow the rubric -

Criteria	Ratings	Pts
Written - attention to spelling, grammar, paragraph and sentence structure and use of terminology that meets academic standards and is appropriate to a presentation accurate and clear, easy to understand clear efforts for engaging slides. This may include pictures, or special effects.		5 pts
5 to >4.0 pts Exemplary Addresses all components to an exemplary level.	4 to >2.0 pts Accomplished Addresses most of these components well	2 to >1.0 pts Beginning Address some of these components well.	1 to >0 pts Not satisfactory Does not follow any standards, no logical flow, unable to understand the meaning.
Introduction: Introduction the topic with an attention grabbing first line. Provides a brief background to the issue. Defines key terms. Clearly states the purpose of the presentation. Provides background information summarising the Coroners case.		4 pts
4 pts Exemplary Addresses all components to an exemplary level.	3 pts Accomplished Addresses most of these components well.	2 pts Beginning Address some of these components well.	0 pts Not satisfactory 0-1 Fails to address these components entirely or mostly

Criteria	Ratings	Pts
Description of scope of practice for the RN, EN and NA: Clearly identifies the scope of practice of each role and how they interact with each other where relevant.		9 pts
9 to >7.0 pts Exemplary Addresses all components to an exemplary level.	7 to >5.0 pts Accomplished Addresses most of these components well.	5 to >2.0 pts Beginning Address some of these components well.	2 to >0 pts Not satisfactory Fails to address these components entirely or mostly.
Differences in RN, EN and NA role - relying on the Coroners case as examples of how each could have been involved in practice Identifies key differences and similarities of each of the nursing roles, relying and drawing on the Coroners Case as an example.		9 pts
9 to >7.0 pts Exemplary Addresses all components to an exemplary level.	7 to >5.0 pts Accomplished Addresses most of these components well.	5 to >2.0 pts Beginning Address some of these components well.	2 to >0 pts Not satisfactory Fails to address these components entirely or mostly.

Criteria	Ratings	Pts
Ethical issues raised in the case relating to breaches of standards, legislation etc.: Uses the Coroners case example to highlight relevant practice standards, legislation and moral obligations, identifying breaches and explaining how they relate to the relevant standard etc.		10 pts
10 to >8.0 pts Exemplary Addresses all components to an exemplary level.	8 to >5.0 pts Accomplished Addresses most of these components well.	5 to >2.0 pts Beginning Address some of these components well.	2 to >0 pts Not satisfactory Fails to address these components entirely or mostly.
Role of the RN and reflection on what the alternative actions could have been by the RN: Considers the role of the RN in the Coroners case and identifies how the RN could have/should have behaved differently. Provides a summary of alternative options for the RN in those circumstances.		5 pts
5 to >4.0 pts Exemplary Addresses all components to an exemplary level.	4 to >3.0 pts Accomplished Addresses most of these components well.	3 to >2.0 pts Beginning Address some of these components well.	2 to >0 pts Not satisfactory 0-2 Fails to address these components entirely or mostly.

Criteria	Ratings	Pts
Personal reflection: Succinctly describe what you have learned from this task and how those learnings will inform your future practice.		4 pts
4 pts Exemplary Addresses all components to an exemplary level.	3 pts Accomplished Addresses most of these components well.	2 pts Beginning Address some of these components well.	0 pts Not satisfactory 0-2 Fails to address these components entirely or mostly.
References: In text referencing complies with APA 7 formatting. Reference list complies with APA7 formatting. Uses primary sources. Uses quality sources.		4 pts
4 pts Exemplary Addresses all components to an exemplary level.	3 pts Accomplished Addresses most of these components well.	2 pts Beginning Address some of these components well.	0 pts Not satisfactory 0-2 Fails to address these components entirely or mostly.
Total Points: 50

Attachments:

Assessment-de....pdf