. What about the distinction the Court makes between depictions of sexual conduct and depic-tions of violence? Is the majority actually saying that the First Amendment law's exception for "obscenity" (Miller v. California, holding that some depictions and descriptions are beyond First Amendment protection) does not apply to depictions and descriptions and interac-tive "acts" of killing, maiming, dismembering, or sexually assaulting an image of a human being, if those acts are depicted" in a manner that "[a] reasonable person, considering the game as a whole, would find appeals to a deviant or morbid interest of minors?