Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

What are the benefits of the Vavilov decision? is.) A) It provides a simpler approach to determining the applicable standard of review forjudicial review is.)

image text in transcribedimage text in transcribedimage text in transcribedimage text in transcribedimage text in transcribed
What are the benefits of the Vavilov decision? is.) A) It provides a simpler approach to determining the applicable standard of review forjudicial review is.) B) It has clearly defined the scope of deference afforded to first instance decision makers its/33' C) It confirmed thatAlexanderVavilov is a Canadian citizen 1.) D) All of the above An immigration, refugee or citizenship decision may be challenged on judicial review m on the basis of procedural deficiencies in the administrative process g because of deficiencies in the analysis of the decision maker on the substance of the decision but not both. I: i True I: i False Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v. Vavilov concerned: A) the review of a decision by the Immigration Division of the IRB finding that Mr. Vavilov was inadmissible to Canada as the dependents of foreign nationals who had engaged in espionage against Canada's interests O B) the review of a decision by the Immigration Appeal Division of the IRB that removal order against Mr. Vavilov should be upheld OC) the review of a decision by the Registrar of Citizenship to cancel Mr. Vavilov's Canadian citizenship O D) the review of a decision by a Minister's delegate to issue a Canadian passport to Mr. Vavilov and his brotherRobert Danay explains the concept of deference with real life examples in "What does standard of review mean?\" (Borderlines podcast #35 with Steven Meurrens). What analogy does Mr. Danay use to describe reasonableness as a deferential standard of review? as.) A) A child who is given authority to decide every day what to eat for breakfast B) A child who is given authority to choose what their mother should wear every day for a week C) A couple deciding which restaurant to visit for dinner L.) D) A spouse having the final say on which restaurant to visit for dinner If an \"adequate alternative remedy" (like an internal appeal mechanism granted by statute) is available in a particular administrative context, it should, as a general rule, be exhausted first, before seeking judicial review. .:;:'_':;:. A) True If :12. B) False

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

The Law Of Healthcare Administration

Authors: Stuart Showalter

9th Edition

1640551301, 978-1640551305

More Books

Students also viewed these Law questions