Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Question
1 Approved Answer
What are the benefits of the Vavilov decision? is.) A) It provides a simpler approach to determining the applicable standard of review forjudicial review is.)
What are the benefits of the Vavilov decision? is.) A) It provides a simpler approach to determining the applicable standard of review forjudicial review is.) B) It has clearly defined the scope of deference afforded to first instance decision makers its/33' C) It confirmed thatAlexanderVavilov is a Canadian citizen 1.) D) All of the above An immigration, refugee or citizenship decision may be challenged on judicial review m on the basis of procedural deficiencies in the administrative process g because of deficiencies in the analysis of the decision maker on the substance of the decision but not both. I: i True I: i False Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v. Vavilov concerned: A) the review of a decision by the Immigration Division of the IRB finding that Mr. Vavilov was inadmissible to Canada as the dependents of foreign nationals who had engaged in espionage against Canada's interests O B) the review of a decision by the Immigration Appeal Division of the IRB that removal order against Mr. Vavilov should be upheld OC) the review of a decision by the Registrar of Citizenship to cancel Mr. Vavilov's Canadian citizenship O D) the review of a decision by a Minister's delegate to issue a Canadian passport to Mr. Vavilov and his brotherRobert Danay explains the concept of deference with real life examples in "What does standard of review mean?\" (Borderlines podcast #35 with Steven Meurrens). What analogy does Mr. Danay use to describe reasonableness as a deferential standard of review? as.) A) A child who is given authority to decide every day what to eat for breakfast B) A child who is given authority to choose what their mother should wear every day for a week C) A couple deciding which restaurant to visit for dinner L.) D) A spouse having the final say on which restaurant to visit for dinner If an \"adequate alternative remedy" (like an internal appeal mechanism granted by statute) is available in a particular administrative context, it should, as a general rule, be exhausted first, before seeking judicial review. .:;:'_':;:. A) True If :12. B) False
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started