What did the U.S. Supreme Court decide in Mayo Foundation v. U.S. regarding the Treasury Department's rule about employment taxes and medical residents? a) The Treasury Department's rule was invalid because Congress had already addressed the issue b) The Treasury Department's rule was valid because Congress failed to address the issue and the agency interpretation was reasonable c) The Treasury Department's rule was valid even though Congress had already addressed the issue and even though the rule was unreasonable d) The Treasury Department's rule was invalid because it was not a reasonable rule in the eyes of the court Taylor Swift seeks information about the recent expenditures of a Federal agency under the Freedom of Information Act. To obtain the information, Taylor must a) Describe the information with reasonable certainty b) Work for a newspaper, magazine, or news network c) Prove she has a substantial need for the information d) Obtain the agency's permission e) Get a court order Under the Chevron deference standard, a court will defer to an agency's legal interpretation if a) Congress directly addressed the issue, and the agency interpretation is reasonable b) Congress directly addressed the issue, and the agency interpretation is unreasonable c) Congress failed to directly address the issue, and the agency interpretation is reasonable d) Congress failed to directly address the issue, and the agency interpretation is unreasonable