WHAT FACTS IN THIS CASE $($IF ANY$)$ SHIFTED YOUR PERSPECTIVE ON THE VALIDITY OF THE LIEBECK LAWSUIT AGAINST MCDONALD'S?

DID MCDONALD'S KNOW THEIR COFFEE TEMPERATURE VIOLATED INDUSTRY STANDARDS AT THE TIME OF THIS CASE FOR ITS SALE TO CONSUMERS?

WERE THERE PRIOR INCIDENTS OF CUSTOMERS BEING INJURED BY MCDONALD'S COFFEE BEFORE THE LIEBECK CASE, AND WERE THERE SIMILAR CASES OF HEAT INJURIES FILED AFTERWARDS $?($EXAMPLES MAY GO BEYOND COFFEE CASES $-$ HINT $-$ CHICKEN MCNUGGETS$)$

DO YOU THINK THE PUNITIVE DAMAGES AWARD IN THIS NEGLIGENCE CASE WAS FAIR AND IF SO $-$ WHY?;

DO YOU CONSIDER THIS A BUSINESS ETHICS CASE, AND IF SO $-$ WHY?

DID YOU USE ChatGPT TO RESEARCH THE LIEBECK CASE, AND IF SO$,$ DID ChatGPT INCREASE YOUR LEARNING FOR THIS FINAL PROJECT?