What is the checkpoint system and how do I look up information on code section 358
Project-v Watch Project Video in Mediasite on April 13 Outline Tax Research Project Choose 1 of the following Topics - Corporate Formations Code Section 351 I Corporate Reorganizations- Code Section 353 a Partnership Formations- Code Section 721 o Exempt Organizations Subchapter F Then write an APA Paper minimum of 5-7 pages include the following. 6 recent- last T years tax cases- found in the Checkpoint system. Each case should be summarized and include the subject, the jurisdiction, the key points of law in the case an: the outcome. 3 news or journal articles do not use anything but major news magazines or accounting type publications. The paper should include an introduction of the topic, a body and a conclusion. Please provide references in APA format. A rubric is below: Flubric for Flee-each Paper in APA style ........ [exceeds standards] {occasionally exceeds] [meets stetdards] Strong introduction Conveys topic atd key Conveys topic, but not of icey ideas md guestlon[s]. Clearly key questiou'btst. terms. Clearly delineates subtopics to Describes delineates be reviewed. General subtopics to be sthopics to be thesis reviewed. General reviewed. Specic theses statement. thesis statement. All material clearly related to the research subtopic, mah topic. Strong organization and integration of material within subtopics. Strong transitions linking subtopics and rrain tn'c. Legal cases included meeting the overall requiernent of at least 5 references are legally based.The others can be magazine or 'ournal articles Strong review of key conclusions or new ideas. able All material clearly related to sumtopic, main topic and logically organized within subtopics. Clea: varied transitions linking subtopics, and main topic. tiniest material clearly related to subtopic. main topic. Material may not be ormnized within subtopics. Attempts to provide variety of transitions Sources well selected to support ideas in paper. Sources generally acceptable but not peervreviewed reseach [evidence]I based. Conclusion Strong review of key conclusions. Review of key conclusions. The writing is not in-depth but E- : nuate. Very few grahmatical, spelling or punctuation errors interfere with reading the paper. The paper meets the full page requirement in assignment. Grarrrnatical errors or spelling a punctuation are rare and do not detract from the paper. The paper is close to the full page requirement in assignment. The paper is free of gren'ITIaticat errors and spelling 3t punctuation. The paper exceeds the full page requiemenl i1 assignment. Unacceptable [below standards} Does not adequately convey topic. Does not describe subtopics to be reviewed. Lacks adequate thesis statement. Little evidence material is logically organized into topic, subtopics or related to topic. Many transitions are unclear or nonexistent. Few sources supporting thesis. Sources insignicant or unsubstantiated. Does not su11malize or reach key conclusion. Grammatical errors or spellings punctuation smela'rtialiy detract from the paper. The paper does not meet the full page Percent weight 10% 30% 20% 10% 10%
