What is the Issue, Rule, Application, and Conclusion?

Would the result would be different under standard contract law.

In September, Auburn Plastics {defendant} submitted price quotations to CBS {plaintiff} for the manufacture of eight cavity molds to be used in making parts for CBS's toys Each quotation specied that the offer would not be binding unless accepted within fteen days. Furthermore, CBS would be subject to an additional 30 percent charge for engineering services upon delivery of the molds. In December, CBS sent detailed purchase orders to Aubum Plastics for cavity molds The purchase order forms stated that CBS reserved the right to remove the molds from Auburn Plastics without an additional or 'withdrawal' charge. ubum Plastics acknowledged the purd1a5e order and stated that the sale would be subject to all conditions contained in the price quotation. CBS paid Auburn for the molds, and Auburn began to fabricate toy parts from the molds for CBS. Later, Auburn announced a price increase, and CBS demanded delivery of the molds. Aubum refused to deliver the molds unless CBS paid the additional charge for engineering services CBS claimed that the contract did not provide for a withdrawal change. til-ho will prevail? Why