1. What possible reasons can there be to justify the lack of interest from the Federal Trade Commission when it comes to alleged fraud by law schools compared with the different approaches in the DeVry and Corinthian College cases?
2. Do you believe that colleges, universities, and law schools owe a fiduciary duty to students where they should put the interests of their students over their own monetary interests? If not, why not? If you think they do owe such a fiduciary duty, how would their practices be different than they are currently?
3. Should such schools be more elitist and only accept the most promising students who are most likely to be gainfully employed in the fields for which they are paying to be educated? Argue for or against a more elitist policy.