What the facts, issues, discussion and conclusion on the below case?

Debbie Lee, a photographer for over 20 years in the State of Success and in the City of Hooray, owns a studio that offers "on location" photography.She really enjoys being able to offer such flexibility.John Bucks owns a new health spa. John had seen and admired Debbie's "on location" photography work.

He called Debbie to arrange

for photography as part of his promotional plan for the spa.John

told her that he planned to lose 50 lbs. He wanted to have "before and

after" pictures taken of himself eating at the spa, working out on the spa

exercise equipment, and hiking along one of the spa's scenic

trails.The pictures were to be displayed in strategic locations

throughout the spa and would be included in the spa's

brochure.Debbie stated that the total charge (5 before and 5 after

pictures) would be $1000.

The parties agreed that the

"before" pictures would be taken on the following

day.When Debbie arrived at the spa, she learned for the first time

that it was a health spa for nudists.She was extremely

uncomfortable, but the naked John persuaded her to stay and take the first set

of pictures.On the next day, John received the five

"before" pictures and a letter from Debbie requesting immediate

payment of $500, and stating that the five "after" pictures would be

taken by her assistant upon notification that John had lost 50 lbs.

John Bucks has consulted with our office concerning whether an enforceable contract even existed as this was not reduced to writing.He also believes that he does not owe her the $500 or the $1000 until Debbie personally completes the photography of the "after" pictures.