What two conclusions about the quality of the patient tables from the data given below?

art 5 X v fx A B C D E F Problem Frequency (# of occurances) Cumulative Frequency Relative Freq Cum Percent% Dirt in paint 65 65 0.345744681 35% Sad looking 43 108 0.574468085 57% Thin paint 31 139 0.739361702 74% Off-color 17 156 0.829787234 83% Orange peel 12 168 0.893617021 89% Scratch 11 179 0.95212766 95% Sealer under 8 187 0.994680851 99% Other 188 100% Total 188 Pareto Analysis- Table Defects 70 100% 99% 100% 60 95% 90% 89% 80% 83% 50 74% 70% 40 60% 57% 20 50% 30 40% 22 20 35% 30% 23 20% 10 10% 0% Dirt in paint Sad looking Thin paint Off-color Orange peel Scratch Sealer under Other Frequency (# of occurances) mm Cum Percent% 34 Sheet1 Ready Average: 12.1456117 Count: 27 Sum: 194.3297872 Add-ins loaded successf H 2 NOV 3 21 A