What was the reason for the decision in Parkdale Custom Built Furniture Pty Ltd v Puxu Pty Ltd $(1982)149$ CLR $191?$

Group of answer choices

A$.$ The target audience of the conduct would not be misled into thinking there was a connection between the two products.

B$.$ A purchaser could be misled if someone removed the labels without the manufacturer$$s knowledge.

C$.$ The products were clearly labelled so there was nothing more the manufacturer could do$.$

D$.$ The conduct could cause consumers to wonder if the products were made by the same manufacturer.