What was the result in the Badilla v$.$ Wal$-$Mart Stores East Inc. case referenced in the text?

A$)$ The court reversed the lower court's decision and held that Wal$-$Mart Stores East Inc. could proceed with its lawsuit.

B$)$ The court remanded the lower court's decision and held that Ken Badilla could proceed with his lawsuit.

C$)$ The court reversed the lower court's decision and held that Ken Badilla could proceed with his lawsuit.

D$)$ The court reversed the lower court's decision and held that Wal$-$Mart Stores East Inc. could proceed with its lawsuit.

E$)$ The court affirmed the lower court's decision and held that Ken Badilla could proceed with his lawsuit.