what's the answer for 12-13 multiple choice questions

30:20 QUESTION 12 1 points Dawn parked her car on the street outside of her house, but forgot to lock the door. During the night, a habitual criminal named Dick opened the door of Dawn's car and her IPad that was in the glove compartment. The next day, Dick sold the IPad to Serge, who had no way of knowing that Dick was a thief. Which of the following statements Is most likely to be TRUE? 1. As long as he honestly had no reason to believe that Dick was a thief, Serge cannot be held liable to Dawn. 2. Even if he honestly had no reason to believe that Dick was a thief, Serge can be held liable to Dawn if in fact the IPad he purchased was the one that Dick stole from Dawn's car. 3. Serge has no liability to Dawn if he can prove that she forgot to lock her car. >4, Even if both men committed torts, Dawn is entitled to sue Dick or Serge, but not both 5. If Serge returns the Ipad to Dawn, he has no right to sue Dick QUESTION 13 1 points Chyna acted as Evan's accountant. In the course of her professional duties, she made a mistake that caused Evan to lose $100 000. Evan has sued Chyna for negligence. She claims, however, that she did not breach the standard of care. Chyna can avoid liability by proving that )1. her carelessness occurred while she was performing a contractual obligation 2. she was inexperienced at the time of the mistake and by proving that a reasonable novice accountant might have made the same mistake. 3. although some professional accountants would have avoided the mistake that she committed, she merely committed an error of judgment. @ 4. she was not really a qualified accountant, even though she had told Evan that she was 5, Evan paid her loss than the market rate so there should be a lower standard of care