When a business works with another company, they often sign a contract to govern the relationship between them. If one company behaves in a negative, scandalous or illegal manner it can reflect badly on the other company even though the other company did nothing wrong. On top of that, the behaviour itself may not be covered by the contract even though it was at least "morally" wrong. In these circumstances, how much is one company responsible for the actions of the other company? Can a company that has done nothing wrong, "turn a blind eye" (or ignore) what the other company did? In this discussion you'll learn a bit about what the obligations are (and are not) for a company in managing its economic "agents". For this exercise, read the article about Nike's Child Labor Mistakes. See what you can learn about what happened. Then answer the questions below. Questions Using concise business language, answer the following questions: 1. Was Nike's decision to employ children to manufacture its products ethical? Why or why not? 2. Was Nike's decision to employ children to manufacture its products socially responsible? Why or why not